2012
DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0452-11-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-centre calibration of an adaptive thresholding method for PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer

Abstract: After multi-centre calibration the use of the contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in the different centres using different scanner types and specific imaging protocols is feasible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polychoric correlations were obtained with the polycor library [30]. Mokken scaling was performed using the mokken library [31,32]. DIF detection was performed using the lordif library [33,34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polychoric correlations were obtained with the polycor library [30]. Mokken scaling was performed using the mokken library [31,32]. DIF detection was performed using the lordif library [33,34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of parameters A and B are known to be specific for the PET system applied in combination with the predefined imaging protocol [34]. Therefore, the use of the contrastoriented algorithm requires a system-specific calibration by phantom measurements described in the respective original publications [13,34].…”
Section: I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, in the current approach I max is determined in the neighborhood of the initial seed, instead of using the whole image as proposed in Christ et al (2013). Parameter values of a and b which are dependent on the PET system and imaging protocol, are derived from calibration according to the multi-centre calibration procedure described in Schaefer et al (2012).…”
Section: (A)b)mentioning
confidence: 99%