2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-class text categorization based on LDA and SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare our method with other methods in verifying the efficiency of extracting coordinate relationship, we adopt the following two kinds of methods, Naïve Bayesian (NB) [20][21][22][23] and Support Vector Machine (SVM) [24][25][26][27]. The detailed descriptions for these two methods are as follows.…”
Section: B Comparison Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare our method with other methods in verifying the efficiency of extracting coordinate relationship, we adopt the following two kinds of methods, Naïve Bayesian (NB) [20][21][22][23] and Support Vector Machine (SVM) [24][25][26][27]. The detailed descriptions for these two methods are as follows.…”
Section: B Comparison Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cao et al [17] introduced the Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm to measure the relevance between topics and find the optimal LDA model by iteration. Li et al [18] introduced category information into the existing LDA model feature selection algorithm and constructed a Support Vector Machine(SVM) multiclass classifier on the implied topic-text matrix to address the problem that traditional feature selection methods generally ignore the semantic relationships between words. Zhao et al [19] proposed determining the optimal number of topics in the LDA model by the rate of change of the perplexity.…”
Section: B Optimal Topic Number Selection In Ldamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain Identification: The selected approaches are clustering-based unsupervised categorisers and do not support domain identification. Use of feature selector to select appropriate domain features [49] or classifiers, such as SVM [16], [50] and K-Nearest Neighbor with topic modelling, can identify service domains. A domain-based IoT services classifier could be a potential future research direction.…”
Section: Qualitative Evaluation and Open Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%