Quantum Chemistry and Dynamics of Excited States 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119417774.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐Configuration Time‐Dependent Hartree Methods: From Quantum to Semiclassical and Quantum‐Classical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides computational efficiency, VC models are attractive because of their conceptual simplicity and the low effort required to parametrize high-dimensional PESs from a few electronic structure calculations. , These features distinguish them from related approaches, such as machine learning , or interpolation of diabatic Hamiltonians, which can potentially deliver more accurate PESs but currently are more difficult to use. For these reasons, VC models have been extensively used in combination with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method for quantum dynamics (QD) studies and to obtain vibronic spectra of moderately sized stiff molecules. ,,, In recent years, VC models experienced a renaissance in the field of exciton dynamics , and in the context of the Frenkel–Holstein vibronic exciton Hamiltonian . However, MCTDH dynamics with VC potentials still formally scales exponentially, becoming infeasible for large systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides computational efficiency, VC models are attractive because of their conceptual simplicity and the low effort required to parametrize high-dimensional PESs from a few electronic structure calculations. , These features distinguish them from related approaches, such as machine learning , or interpolation of diabatic Hamiltonians, which can potentially deliver more accurate PESs but currently are more difficult to use. For these reasons, VC models have been extensively used in combination with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method for quantum dynamics (QD) studies and to obtain vibronic spectra of moderately sized stiff molecules. ,,, In recent years, VC models experienced a renaissance in the field of exciton dynamics , and in the context of the Frenkel–Holstein vibronic exciton Hamiltonian . However, MCTDH dynamics with VC potentials still formally scales exponentially, becoming infeasible for large systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-lived coherent vibronic features as observed in the present model complex indeed appear in spatially extended systems with dense electronic manifolds, too. 40,51,65 As underscored by our previous studies, 11,52 more approximate quantum-classical approaches may fail for this type of systems. For these reasons, on-the-fly dynamics for these systems, which is often restricted to Ehrenfest molecular dynamics 66 or Surface-Hopping dynamics, 67 remain highly challenging.…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 90%
“…More approximate methods like Ehrenfest dynamics fail entirely for this system, 11 while Multi-Configuration Ehrenfest (MCE) approaches lead to slow convergence for a limited number of modes (typically for 10-40 modes). 11,52 For similar numbers of modes, vMCG dynamics are difficult to converge, too, while the G-MCTDH approach works well, but becomes rapidly expensive. 52 Using 2L-GMCTDH, converged calculations could be performed up to 100 modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The costs are negligible compared with the same-level QC calculation. 12,29 Thus, many studies have used ML potentials as a prominent accelerator for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD) simulations, for instance, multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) 30 and trajectory surface hopping (TSH) 31 calculations. Several groups have developed ML mixed quantum−classical NAMD approaches (called ML photodynamics in this Account), such as MLAtom 32 with Newton-X 33 and SchNarc 34 with SHARC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%