2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5ob01865j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-conformer molecules in solutions: an NMR-based DFT/MP2 conformational study of two glucopyranosides of a vitamin E model compound

Abstract: Overall conformations of both anomeric per-O-acetylated glucosyl derivatives of 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethylchroman-6-ol were studied in the context of their high flexibility, on the basis of NMR spectra in CDCl3 solution and related DFT calculation results. A few computational protocols were used, including diverse density functional/basis set combinations with a special emphasis on accounting (at various steps of the study) for the impact of intramolecular London-dispersion (LD) effects on geometries and relative G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater value of the Pearson correlation coefficient r or its square r 2 was considered as a very simple indication of better adjustment of the compared J data (vide infra). In addition, the four standard statistical metrics for errors, namely, the root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD), mean absolute deviation (MAD=(1/ n )∑ i |JicalcdJiobsd |, where n is the total number of J CH values), corrected RMSD, that is, CRMSD=[(1/ n )∑ i (JicorrJiobsd ) 2 ] 1/2 , and corrected MAD (CMAD=(1/ n )∑ i |JicorrJiobsd |), were used as much more reliable estimates of the uncertainties of calculation results. Moreover, maximum positive or negative deviations between the Jicalcd (or Jicorr ) and Jiobsd data, that is, max(+/−), were evaluated.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The greater value of the Pearson correlation coefficient r or its square r 2 was considered as a very simple indication of better adjustment of the compared J data (vide infra). In addition, the four standard statistical metrics for errors, namely, the root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD), mean absolute deviation (MAD=(1/ n )∑ i |JicalcdJiobsd |, where n is the total number of J CH values), corrected RMSD, that is, CRMSD=[(1/ n )∑ i (JicorrJiobsd ) 2 ] 1/2 , and corrected MAD (CMAD=(1/ n )∑ i |JicorrJiobsd |), were used as much more reliable estimates of the uncertainties of calculation results. Moreover, maximum positive or negative deviations between the Jicalcd (or Jicorr ) and Jiobsd data, that is, max(+/−), were evaluated.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…All molecular structures of flexible systems 1 – 6 were computed starting from their MMX (1986) geometries created with PCMODEL . Specifically, an extensive conformational search for preferred forms was carried out with an internal GMMX randomize subroutine of the above program, in a similar manner to that described elsewhere . Further cascade geometry refinement of low‐energy candidate conformers was done with the Gaussian 09 package .…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such works start with full structure optimization, followed by vibrational analysis . In many cases, gauge‐independent atomic orbital approach allows reasonable prediction of isotropic nuclear magnetic shieldings and the corresponding theoretical chemical shifts . Somehow more difficult calculations provide theoretical indirect spin–spin coupling constants (SSCCs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%