2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-constrained ascent guidance for solid propellant launch vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the ascent phase of launch systems, the iterative guidance method has been widely and successfully used in the past few decades [5,6]. However, for most rocket engines, the thrust magnitude is uncontrollable, and the time and position of orbital injection cannot be constrained based on the iterative guidance method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the ascent phase of launch systems, the iterative guidance method has been widely and successfully used in the past few decades [5,6]. However, for most rocket engines, the thrust magnitude is uncontrollable, and the time and position of orbital injection cannot be constrained based on the iterative guidance method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [18] generates the general energy management (GEM) method according to the relation between the arc and the central angle, in the process of which the velocity increment in the required velocity vector direction is controlled by the closed-loop commands. References [19,20] and [21] use the linear programming method to design an open-loop alternating attitude energy management algorithm (AEM) and spline energy management (SEM) guidance method, which further neutralizes the additional velocity component to strengthen the terminal constraints. Although these classical methods have been reliably and widely applied to the current launch vehicles, there are some limitations of the above methods in the solid rocket with burn-coast-burn flight mode such as the improvement of mission requirements, especially under the characteristics of fast response mission, because the closed-loop guidance method does not have multiterminal constraint capability, and the iterative guidance method is only applicable to the propulsion process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid-propellant motors are the best choice for unguided rockets as they are simple, lightweight, cost-effective, can remain in storage for long periods and are easily able to deliver required thrust needed during the initial phase of flight (Pallone et al, 2018;Parhi et al, 2015;Xu and Zhang, 2018;Yılmaz et al, 2017). External ballistics is a very important topic in the design of solid-propellant rockets as this deals with ensuring required trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%