Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects

Broniewicz, Elżbieta; Ogrodnik, Karolina

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351

Cited by 105 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the most popular multi-criteria ranking methods used in Poland [36][37][38][39] and in the world [40][41][42][43][44] is the AHP method, which is used in this study to evaluate the interchanges. The popularity of using this method, compared to other methods of multi-criteria decision support, is constantly growing [45].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here, only some of the examples of how the AHP method is applied for transport are considered. The method was used to evaluate the assumed variant solutions in terms of transport of oversize cargo [36], selection of routing schemes taking into environmental impact [37,43], multi-criteria evaluation of public transport projects [38], improvement of public transport [39,44], improvement of human security within railway stations [40], road accident factor prioritization [41], and building of a new metro station [42]. According to research by Huang et al [45], out of 312 analyzed articles, 150 concern the AHP method, which is 48%.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of the Hierarchy Analysis Method to Assess Interchanges in Cracow

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We propose an assessment methodology of interchanges, which is based on one of four multi-criteria decision aid method, the AHP method, allowing the ranking of interchanges from best to worst with regard to specific criteria. The selected criteria account for different evaluation aspects (social, technical, functional, environmental, and economic ones). The final ranking of the interchanges from best to worst allows making conclusions related to assessed elements of interchanges, which should be improved to make interchanges friendlier to the passengers. The proposed interchange assessment method allows the identification of the weakest elements of the assessed interchanges, which require improvement in order to make the interchanges friendlier for passengers, with a view to increasing the number of passengers and boosting passengers’ willingness to use the interchanges.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of the Hierarchy Analysis Method to Assess Interchanges in Cracow

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, it is important to consider which of these methods are most appropriate for solving specific tasks. In the scientific articles, researchers (Broniewicz & Ogrodnik, 2020;Deluka-Tibljaš, Karleuša, & Dragičević, 2013;Erdogan & Kaya, 2019;Mardani, Zavadskas, Khalifah, Jusoh, & MD Nor, 2016) examine the popularity of MCDM methods within the projects associated with transport infrastructure. Based on the literature, it can be stated that the AHP method is one of the most popular, it is used to determine the importance coefficients of smart mobility system indicators (Broniewicz & Ogrodnik, 2020;Boselli et al, 2015;Castillo & Pitfield, 2010;Deluka-Tibljaš et al, 2013, Erdogan & Kaya, 2019Farooq et al, 2019;Podvezko, Sivilevicius, & Podviezko, 2014).…”

Section: Review Of Mcdm Methods In Field Of Transportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation Criteria of Smart City Mobility System Using MCDM Method

Zapolskytė

Burinskienė

Trépanier

2020

BJRBE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While many cities around the world qualify themselves as “smart cities”, there is no comprehensive way to evaluate to what extent they are “smart”. This article proposes a framework for comparison of the level of “smartness” of the urban mobility systems. The most relevant indicators that have the greatest impact on smart mobility systems were selected in the course of literature review. The impact of indicators on smart mobility systems is variable. Evaluating smart mobility systems, different authors distinguish between different indicators, which usually do not duplicate. The paper categorizes the indicators of the smart mobility system into five groups, called “factors”: motor travel and congestion reduction measures; pollution reduction measures; travel safety and accident reduction measures; traffic management tools and services; smart infrastructure measures. A number of indicators are attributed to each of the listed groups. A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making method, namely, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, has been used to evaluate the significance of the smartness level used in the research. This method bases the weighting of subjective criteria on expert judgement. Rank correlation is used to determine the consistency of expert opinions. A model has been developed to compare smart mobility systems of individual cities and their infrastructure.

show abstract

“…Some relevant and recent examples in this direction include the works in [24,25] for agriculture, those in [26,27] for fisheries, and finally, those in [28][29][30] for forestry. Although there are different methodologies grouped under the umbrella of MCDM techniques, which appear in later sections, one of these techniques should be especially mentioned due to its preponderance in multiple areas, namely the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which has been the technique most widely used in other fields [20,31,32]. There are several reasons explaining this fact [33], and undoubtedly one of them is the flexibility offered by this methodology in order to hybridize with other tools, whether or not they belong to the toolkit of the MCDM techniques.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Sustainable Management of Land and Fisheries Resources Using Multicriteria Techniques: A Meta-Analysis

Dı́az-Balteiro

Iglesias-Merchán

Romero

et al. 2020

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years modern societies have attached a multifunctional requirement to the use of renewable resources, making their optimal sustainable management more complex. In the last decades, in many cases, this complexity is addressed by formulating management models with the help of the concepts and methods belonging to the well-known multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) paradigm. The purpose of this paper was to undertake a hermeneutic meta-analysis of the literature provided in primary journals on issues related to the management of these resources with the help of the MCDM paradigm. In this way, the paper aimed to obtain new, basic insights with considerations that might improve the efficiency of future research in the field studied. The meta-analysis was implemented by formulating and testing a battery of hypotheses of how the MCDM methods have been used in the past for the formulation of management models for the type of resource analyzed.

show abstract

Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects

Cited by 105 publications

References 53 publications

Application of the Hierarchy Analysis Method to Assess Interchanges in Cracow

Application of the Hierarchy Analysis Method to Assess Interchanges in Cracow

Evaluation Criteria of Smart City Mobility System Using MCDM Method

The Sustainable Management of Land and Fisheries Resources Using Multicriteria Techniques: A Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About