Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites

Abstract

Decision-making in environmental projects is typically a complex and confusing exercise, characterized by trade-offs between socio-political, environmental, and economic impacts. Cost-benefit analyses are often used, occasionally in concert with comparative risk assessment, to choose between competing project alternatives. The selection of appropriate remedial and abatement policies for contaminated sites, landuse planning and other regulatory decision-making problems for contaminated sites involves multiple criteria such as cost, benefit, environmental impact, safety, and risk. Some of these criteria cannot easily be condensed into a monetary value, which complicates the integration problem inherent to making comparisons and trade-offs. Even if it were possible to convert criteria rankings into a common unit this approach would not always be desirable since stakeholder preferences may be lost in the process. Furthermore, environmental concerns often involve ethical and moral principles that may not be related to any economic use or value.Considerable research in the area of multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has made available practical methods for applying scientific decision theoretical approaches to multi-criteria problems. However, these methods have not been formalized into a framework readily applicable to environmental projects dealing with contaminated and disturbed sites where risk assessment and stakeholder participation are of crucial concern. This paper presents a review of available literature on the application of MCDA in environmental projects. Based on this review, the paper develops a decision analytic framework specifically tailored to deal with decision making at contaminated sites. 15I. Linkov and A. Bakr Ramadan (eds.)

Sustainability Assessment Criteria for Projects and Technologies: Judgements of Industry Managers

“…The approach aims to highlight the conflicts and reach compromise by following a transparent process. Many different MCDA methods have been introduced [8]. A number of benefits and limitations have been noted in using the MCDA techniques [9,10]:…”

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

“…Applications include technology development or acquisition portfolios within for a single area (e.g., Solar energy, [12]) or across areas of renewable energy technologies [147] or other types of green technologies, e.g, [109]. Likewise, sets of possible remediation e¤orts [148] can treated as project portfolios. Another related problem is site selection, e.g., selecting a number of sites for the disposal or storage of industrial [149] or even nuclear [150] waste.…”

Building a New Urban Highway or Elevating an Old One? Finding Optimum Solution Based on Environmental Impacts

“…By the end of the 1980-ies, number of researchers started development of special procedures and new contents for environmental impact assessment such as ecological framework and social impact assessment [15,16,17]. Meanwhile, numerous researches developed methodology of environmental impact assessment, for example, synthesis Weight [18] Artificial Aggregate Systems [19,20] MCDM and MCDA approaches [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Risk Assessment [28,29,30] AHP, ANP and fuzzy logic [7,31,32,33,34,35].…”