2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-013-0423-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision analysis in adaptation decision-making: a flood case study in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary data (from document reviews, interviews or focus groups) are required to identify the range of options. MCDA is useful when decisions involve uncertainty but need to be made quickly (Kiker et al 2005;Scheuer et al 2011;Porthin et al 2013;Sahin et al 2013;Munaretto et al 2014) Cost-benefit and costeffectiveness analysis…”
Section: Impactsresponsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary data (from document reviews, interviews or focus groups) are required to identify the range of options. MCDA is useful when decisions involve uncertainty but need to be made quickly (Kiker et al 2005;Scheuer et al 2011;Porthin et al 2013;Sahin et al 2013;Munaretto et al 2014) Cost-benefit and costeffectiveness analysis…”
Section: Impactsresponsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2, most of the reviewed studies have applied a technical decision-making approach, combining different kinds of qualitative and quantitative information, and all of them have included multiple criteria in the evaluation process to tackle the complexity of the adaptation problem. Even though societal decision-making approaches are preferred in principle when the issues at stake are highly complex, technical decision making is useful when there is no need to include the public because the issues are predominantly technical and/or resources are scarce (see, e.g., Porthin et al 2013). In fact, although technical evaluations are generally inexpensive-apart from gathering information with ad hoc surveys, the application of societal multicriteria methods is usually resource-, data-, and timeintensive (Rauschmayer andWittmer 2006, Qin et al 2008).…”
Section: Participatory Multicriteria Methods and Their Relevance For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed, this approach is also suggested in climate adaptation decisions. For instance, Porthin et al (2013) indicate the flexibility of those responding to the principle of scalability of constructions. For example, coastal protection or water storage infrastructure can be designed to allow for midterm adjustments to more severe storms and floods.…”
Section: Adaptive Governance and Its Relevance For Climate Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the methodologies have some limitations (e.g., only address a single hazard type), they provide a reasonable starting point for this activity. Additional methodologies, such as multicriteria decision analysis [e.g., see Gregory and Keeney 1994;Porthin et al 2013;Scrieciu et al 2014;Wardekker et al 2016] and other optimization techniques where multiple criteria are simultaneously optimized, also provide useful support for prioritization. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1190GB-13…”
Section: Collaboration Of Infrastructure Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%