2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision analysis of electricity sector transition policy in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The study suggested that potential power shortages require more sustainable and renewable energy [66]. Another research has shown that there may be a comprehensive change in energy consumption in Korea in the future and ways to address complex sustainability issues [67]. Electricity demand was assessed using the LA approach, aiming to upgrade the estimates using the past pattern.…”
Section: 73mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study suggested that potential power shortages require more sustainable and renewable energy [66]. Another research has shown that there may be a comprehensive change in energy consumption in Korea in the future and ways to address complex sustainability issues [67]. Electricity demand was assessed using the LA approach, aiming to upgrade the estimates using the past pattern.…”
Section: 73mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have focused on improving system efficiency, competitiveness, and installed generating capacity Example from the extant literature includes hybrid NG‐RE‐powered generating systems (e.g., Xu et al, 2017), analysis of efficiency and distributional effects of electricity rate designs and grid support services under high DERs penetration (Byrne et al, 2022; Byrne & Taminiau, 2016; Zhang & Giannakis, 2016), regulatory policy innovations (e.g., Carley et al, 2018), and diversified utility customer choice and generation mix (Stewart, 2020; e.g., Nyangon & Byrne, 2018). Similar studies include expanding rooftop solar PV development (e.g., Byrne & Taminiau, 2018), investigating sociotechnical dynamics of energy transitions (e.g., Choi et al, 2020; Jenkins et al, 2018; Sovacool, 2017; Turnheim & Sovacool, 2020), and promoting integrated coordination of electric and NG power systems (Jiang et al, 2018; e.g., Brandstätt et al, 2017). Additionally, Jenner et al (2012) assessed the drivers of RE electricity generation at the state level, including market structure and existence of solar energy associations, while Lee and Zhong (2015) investigated policy effectiveness of net‐metering mechanisms for distributed solar PV systems.…”
Section: Low‐carbon Flexible Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Returning to physical and financial carbon assets at risk of being stranded, ML and AI techniques can provide appealingly pragmatic Pareto-optimal solutions for mitigating stranding risks among different policy aspects instead of using scalarization, thereby creating a balanced transition to lower-carbon technology [93][94][95]. What causes assets to strand?…”
Section: Mitigating Stranded Assets Risks Using ML and Ai Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%