2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision approach and sustainable territorial subsystems: An Italian rural and mountain area case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is really important to be implemented in the middle of coronavirus because the employment rate remains increasing despite the pandemic. However, if the capital is getting limited, the third scenario will be implemented ( Smith et al., 2017 ; Zolin et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is really important to be implemented in the middle of coronavirus because the employment rate remains increasing despite the pandemic. However, if the capital is getting limited, the third scenario will be implemented ( Smith et al., 2017 ; Zolin et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of the state of sustainability at different territorial levels (in our case municipalities) allows policy makers to target policies and strategies for achieving a balance between the different sustainability dimensions. The literature offers numerous applications relating to the measurement of sustainability [5,8,9,12,36] mainly in rural areas, but peripheral areas are not excluded. Our study, compared to those proposed by the literature, focuses on four territorial typologies that hinge on the concept of periphery, connecting it to that of rurality, which, in the selected municipalities, has been shown to be either intermediate rural or rural with comprehensive development problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the environmental pillar, a balance among the possible risks (hydrogeological risk and soil erosion) and positive impacts on the environment (organic farmers and park areas) were taken into consideration. ECO5-GSP/TAA Gross saleable production (GSP) over total agricultural area (TAA) CREA -RICA, 2018 [22] ECO6-Agrit_Income/AWU Income from agritourism over annual working units (AWU = 1800h/year) CREA -RICA, 2018 [22] Environment (ENV) ENV1-Flood risk Area in square kilometers in which there is a medium flood risk (time for recovery between 100 and 200 years) ISTAT, 2018 [15] ENV2-Risk of landslide Area in square kilometers with at least high risk of landslides ISTAT, 2018 [15] ENV3-Fertilizer Quantity of fertilizer products for each hectare of the municipality RICA, 2018 [22] ENV4-Organic agriculture Number of organic farmers over the total farmers RICA, 2018 [22] ENV5-Land consumption Land turned into artificial land over total land (%) ISPRA, 2019 [23] ENV6-Park Area Presence of a national or regional park in the municipality (YES/NO) Websites of each national or regional park Among the mathematical and machine learning tools available to decision makers, due to the ease with which its outcomes can be understood, RST appears to be the best fit for this multi-attribute analysis [9,13]. The theory enunciated by Pawlak [24] relies mainly on two concepts: the indiscernibility relations and the equivalence of classes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they are discriminated against in terms of income, and not just in relation to the plain areas. They present a scarcely differentiated productive structure and limited job opportunities, as well as reduced access to public utilities and communication services, to mention just a few differentiating factors (Zolin et al 2017). In these areas, active agriculture plays a decisive role in terms of environmental protection and biodiversity conservation, as well as prevention from extreme climatic events (such as floods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%