2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on Modern Methods of Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, 10%, 15%, and 20% of the minimum value have been set for each criterion, respectively. Note that C7 is the only criterion considered with real values instead of intervals (q = p = 0) because it comes from the normalization of social impacts obtained through qualitative scales [39]. Table 12 includes the results with the rankings of alternatives in the AHP and ANP with ELECTRE IS combinations.…”
Section: Results Combining the Criteria Weights Of The Ahp And Anp Gr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, 10%, 15%, and 20% of the minimum value have been set for each criterion, respectively. Note that C7 is the only criterion considered with real values instead of intervals (q = p = 0) because it comes from the normalization of social impacts obtained through qualitative scales [39]. Table 12 includes the results with the rankings of alternatives in the AHP and ANP with ELECTRE IS combinations.…”
Section: Results Combining the Criteria Weights Of The Ahp And Anp Gr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 provides the criteria involved in the assessment and a description of the impact it represents. The resulting impacts on the economy, the environment and society have been calculated for each alternative following the evaluation method proposed by Sánchez-Garrido et al [39], sharing the same product system provided in the present case study.…”
Section: Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the contractor's expertise is very demanding to be able to develop mitigation of performance failures. So that through the EVM method the contractor can predict the value of CPI and SPI to see project performance and ensure that the work continues according to the targets set by the stakeholders [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the distance to the worst result is used to rank among the alternatives. This is the greatest advantage of the TOPSIS method [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%