2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2018.8500451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles using Fuzzy Dempster-Shafer Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They did not consider the environment of human-driven vehicles and lane-changing behavior in different and unexplored places [20] Maximum likelihood estimation, sensors, GPS, V2V High deployment costs; can handle only a linear function [21] DL, convolution network-CNVPS (GCN-CNVPS), GPS, V2V Assumptions made for GPS errors [22] Fuzzy logic, Dempster-Shafer Theory Communication issues not discussed [23] Collision avoidance algorithm Collisions can be identified and avoided in connected vehicles only [24] CCTV surveillance footage Poor results for small vehicles The accident process may take longer due to heuristics [25] Cellular network, multi-hop ideal sending calculation Probability of failure due to unpredicted behaviors in traffic A1. Cont.…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did not consider the environment of human-driven vehicles and lane-changing behavior in different and unexplored places [20] Maximum likelihood estimation, sensors, GPS, V2V High deployment costs; can handle only a linear function [21] DL, convolution network-CNVPS (GCN-CNVPS), GPS, V2V Assumptions made for GPS errors [22] Fuzzy logic, Dempster-Shafer Theory Communication issues not discussed [23] Collision avoidance algorithm Collisions can be identified and avoided in connected vehicles only [24] CCTV surveillance footage Poor results for small vehicles The accident process may take longer due to heuristics [25] Cellular network, multi-hop ideal sending calculation Probability of failure due to unpredicted behaviors in traffic A1. Cont.…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mobility sector, studies have sought to optimise multi-criteria functions, such as accessibility, safety, legal rules, passenger preferences (e.g., comfort) and energy consumption (Campos et al 2009;Claussmann et al 2018). For example, Multi-actor Multi-criteria Analysis (MAMCA) can include multiple stakeholders in the process of making decisions about sustainable mobility, including an assessment of low-carbon transport policy (Huang et al 2021).…”
Section: Developing a Common Evaluative Framework: In Search Of A Supervalue And Shared Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral comfort not only combines the lateral acceleration and jerk, but it also includes the smoothness of the path, obtained from the first and second derivative of its curvature, as in [ 18 ]. In [ 32 ], the collision risk is minimized by increasing the distance to the existing obstacles in the driving scene; in [ 33 ], the authors propose different metrics such as time headway or lateral and longitudinal distances to surrounding obstacles, and in [ 34 ], the risk metric is directly linked to the lane departure of the vehicle. With this in mind, the safety is computed by measuring the distance to static obstacles, the average inter-distance to a leader vehicle (if present) and the lane invasion of the candidates.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%