2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12351-020-00552-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer

Abstract: Many managers and firm owners nowadays pay special attention to green supplier selection to gain competitive advantage all over the world. Consequently, this subject a critical and significant decision for firms. This study utilizes an extension to analytical hierarchy process (AHP) under interval type-2 fuzzy environment (IT2FAHP) model to better cope with ambiguity and vagueness for solving supplier selection problem considering green concepts. A real case application is also performed in a home appliance ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
70
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the MHE alternative rating for each criterion are presented in Table 3. PR Cost Flexibility in material [32] FIM Benefit Cost [33] C Cost Availability of spare parts [34] AV Benefit On-site repair [35] OSR Benefit Area constraints [36] AC Benefit Risk [37] R Cost Distance to be moved [38] DIS Benefit…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the MHE alternative rating for each criterion are presented in Table 3. PR Cost Flexibility in material [32] FIM Benefit Cost [33] C Cost Availability of spare parts [34] AV Benefit On-site repair [35] OSR Benefit Area constraints [36] AC Benefit Risk [37] R Cost Distance to be moved [38] DIS Benefit…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buradaki çalışmaya benzer şekilde Fuzzy TOPSIS yaklaşımı da faktörleri önceliklendirmede kullanılmaktadır (Rafi vd., 2020). Bunların dışında çok kriterli karar destek sistemlerinde PROMETHEE (Tian, Xu ve Gu, 2019), ELECTRE (Jahan ve Zavadskas, 2019), VIKOR (Fei, Deng ve Hu, 2019), AHP (Ecer, 2020) ve KEMIRA (Sariçali ve Kundakci, 2019) gibi çeşitli modeller de kullanılmaktadır. Buradaki çalışma Fuzzy TOPSIS modeli ile kısmi bir benzerlik göstermektedir.…”
Section: Araştırma Bulguları (Research Findings)unclassified
“…IT2F-AHP can better handle uncertainties and vagueness of decision-making problem [15] Additionally, IT2F-AHP can easily reduce the uncertainty from decision-makers' opinion in the comparison matrix. Consequently, this feature of IT2F-AHP method, which makes the linguistic evaluations of decision makers more effective and more flexible, makes it superior to other similar methods [15]. The benefit of COPRAS-G is as follows: (i) having a few calculation steps and short calculation time compared to AHP and TOPSIS method, (ii) COPRAS method has the possibility of calculating the values to be maximized and minimized separately among the criteria [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interval type-2 fuzzy AHP (IT2F-AHP), was originally developed by [73], provides many advantages compared to classical AHP and type-1 fuzzy AHP. IT2F-AHP can better handle uncertainties and vagueness of decision-making problem [15] Additionally, IT2F-AHP can easily reduce the uncertainty from decision-makers' opinion in the comparison matrix. Consequently, this feature of IT2F-AHP method, which makes the linguistic evaluations of decision makers more effective and more flexible, makes it superior to other similar methods [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%