Multi-criteria decision-making for marine propulsion: Hybrid, diesel electric and diesel mechanical systems from cost-environment-risk perspectives

Abstract

The paper introduces a new decision-making process which is used to compare the performance of a ship with either diesel electric hybrid propulsion or conventional propulsion systems. A case study was carried out to compare the performance of both propulsions from cost, environmental and risk perspectives. This paper also overviews the modern approaches of multi-criteria decision-making and highlights some of their shortcomings in particular the fact that these approaches often rely on different criteria such as financial, environmental or risk. This paper aims to overcome this shortcoming by enhancing the process of multi-criteria decision analysis. The key process in this research was to convert all incomparable values into monetary values, thereby enabling the impacts of each criterion to be compared and integrated in a straightforward manner. Results of the case study showed that the use of a hybrid propulsion system could reduce annual operational costs by $ 300,000 (2 % total cost) compared with a diesel electric system and almost $ 1 million (7 %) compared to a diesel *Revised Manuscript with No Changes Marked mechanical propulsion system. In order to investigate the optimal use of the hybrid propulsion system, various operational scenarios were identified and applied to the proposed decision-making process. The results showed that operating the ship in hybrid mode during manoeuvring and berthing is more desirable as the holistic cost can reduce in almost $ 1 million. The advantages of the proposed decision making process was illustrated by comparing the results obtained from a conventional decision-making process using the analytical hierarchical method. It is believed that the research findings not only present general understanding of the possible advantages of hybrid propulsion for stakeholders, but provide them with an insight into the enhanced approach into the multi-criteria decision analysis.

Towards the IMO’s GHG Goals: A Critical Overview of the Perspectives and Challenges of the Main Options for Decarbonizing International Shipping

“…Despite major technological advances in battery capacity and efficiency, batteries must still become considerably more efficient and less heavy to meet the needs of large ocean-going ships. While several mature applications of battery-electric propulsion can be found in the short-sea-shipping segment (the first battery-electric short-sea ferry headed out in 2015) [125,126], much work is still needed before similar applications in the deep-sea market. This does not exclude the successful application of batteries on large ocean-going ships for specific purposes [127].…”

Selection of the Most Sustainable Renewable Energy System for Bozcaada Island: Wind vs. Photovoltaic

“…Since the regulatory legislation for ship emissions in the maritime industry has brought the need for improving energy efficiency for environmental benefits, organizations, and governments that started to give funds for research and development studies in this field. Recently, three HORIZON2020 Projects (namely Ship Life cycle software solutions (SHIPLYS, HOLISHIP and LINCOLN) are funded by the European Union (EU) [3], which aims to develop the software integration process for ships considering environmental benefits and their outcomes published in References [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Integration of renewable energy technologies to short-route ferries [10] are also carried out in order to emphasize the importance of such systems in reducing the emissions for the countries that currently have no stringent regulation.…”

Life Cycle Performance Assessment Tool Development and Application with a Focus on Maintenance Aspects

“…I LCPA = f LCC * I LCC + f LCA * I LCA ; where f LCC + f LCA = 1 (3) It is worthwhile mentioning that different approaches are possible to combine economic and environmental aspects, for example, converting all incomparable values into monetary values [12]. To better understand the LCPA software and its further improvements developed in this paper, a synthesis of the main topics are proposed in the following sections.…”