Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry

Dožić, Slavica

doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101683

Cited by 70 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 168 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The growth of the aviation industry has a positive impact on passengers through the creation of multiple travel directions. According to Dožić (2019), in general, each stakeholder (airlines, airports, Air Traffic Management (ATM), aircraft manufacturers) creates many jobs in the air transport system and thus contributes to the economic development of the country. Kucuk Yilmaz et al (2018) emphasise that in order for economic growth, key players -airlines, airports, air navigation system providers and system oversight bodiesneed to work together and be interconnected.…”

Section: Specifics Of the Aviation Sector: A Systematic Approach To Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Dziedzic and Warnock-Smith (2016), the strategic choice of low-cost carriers is the choice of primary or secondary airports, where the most important criteria for selecting the operating airport are price, demand and efficiency. On the other hand, airports need to decide what to do if they need to choose a location, determine the appropriate level of service, or improve their performance or competitive position in the market (Dožić, 2019). It is the job of air navigation service providers to ensure an adequate level of safety when dealing with aircraft congestion.…”

Section: Specifics Of the Aviation Sector: A Systematic Approach To Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is the job of air navigation service providers to ensure an adequate level of safety when dealing with aircraft congestion. According to Dožić (2019), air traffic management problems include problems related to safety problems and human factors (stress due to workload, human error, etc.) To sum up, all the organisations operating in the aviation sector, such as airports, ground-handling companies, air navigation service providers, aircraft manufacturers and training institutes, it can be concluded that the primary objective of all stakeholders is not profit, but rather safety.…”

Section: Specifics Of the Aviation Sector: A Systematic Approach To Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the major goals of airlines is to match capacity and demand in prevailing market conditions, which has a direct impact on profitability gains and cost reductions (Dožić, 2019). As many of the authors under study point out, the primary purpose of the airline market is to meet passengers' expectations.…”

Section: The Needs and Objectives Of Airlines And Their Implementatiomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Solutions for Improving the Partnership Between Airport and Airline Companies

Tunčikienė

Katinas

2020

Business, Management and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – For every country’s economy, air transport is strategically and vitally important. For improving the quality of air transport services provision, partnerships between airports and airlines need to be encouraged more. The application of partnerships leads to quality improvements of services provided by companies and raises the efficiency of used practices. A number of the factors, which determine the effective partnership between organisations operating in the aviation sector, is examined on the basis of specialised literature. The study addresses the question of how organisations interact with each other and what factors determine the need for partnership. Having identified common factors in the organisation’s operational interface and the need for it in the aviation sector and having analysed the practical examples of partnerships, the ways to enhance these factors are explored in order to achieve effective partnerships between airports and airlines. Research methodology – consists of comparative analysis, methods of logical analysis and abstraction, multi-criteria evaluation. Findings – The solution to the problem is expressed by identifying the factors of an effective partnership between the airports and the airlines and selecting the criteria for the assessment of the favourable effects of airport cooperation activities, and their hierarchical schemes from the positions of the airlines. Practical implications – Using multi-criteria assessment methods is easy to construct matrices of initial estimates, calculate final estimates and thus decide which airport is the most appropriate partner for an airline or vice versa.Originality/Value – A unique and, at the same time, a universal system of criteria, the application of which provides the preconditions for the development of the partnership, is created. Research limitations – The availability of data is limited to determine the reasonable values of the partnership criteria.

show abstract

Section: Specifics Of the Aviation Sector: A Systematic Approach To Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Specifics Of the Aviation Sector: A Systematic Approach To Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Specifics Of the Aviation Sector: A Systematic Approach To Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Needs and Objectives Of Airlines And Their Implementatiomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Solutions for Improving the Partnership Between Airport and Airline Companies

Tunčikienė

Katinas

2020

Business, Management and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Como consequência disso, decisões estratégicas não podem se basear apenas nas experiências ou intuições de seus tomadores de decisão, uma vez que podem refletir um juízo de valor particular e não coletivo. Portanto, é indicado aos tomadores de decisão o uso de uma metodologia científica para a tomada de decisão, de forma a permitir a avaliação adequada de um conjunto de critérios que auxiliará no processo de tomada de decisão [2].…”

unclassified

Modelo de apoio a tomada de decisão na gestão de portfólio de projetos com base em uma abordagem de análise multicritério

Boeno¹,

Chiwiacowsky²

2020

SCI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A seleção do portfólio de projetos é crucial para a sobrevivência das organizações, que devem tomar decisões baseadas em um conjunto amplo de informações. Como consequência disso, decisões estratégicas não podem se basear apenas nas experiências ou intuições de seus tomadores de decisão, uma vez que podem refletir um juízo de valor particular e não coletivo. Portanto, é indicado aos tomadores de decisão o uso de uma metodologia científica para a tomada de decisão. Nesse contexto, este estudo tem como objetivo o desenvolvimento de um modelo de decisão multicritério, em conjunto com aplicação de um método de análise multicritério, que auxilie os responsáveis na gestão do portfólio de projetos das empresas, a fim de assegurar que o investimento realizado seja o mais assertivo possível. O modelo foi criado com o uso do método AHP, para o cálculo do peso dos critérios, e do método PROMETHEE, para a ordenação das alternativas. Para cumprir a metodologia estabelecida pelos métodos, foi necessário a definição de critérios, sua adequada ponderação e avaliação de projetos no modelo. Os testes realizados com 20 projetos trouxeram resultados satisfatórios. Pode-se perceber a diferença de 42,21% entre os projetos menos e mais atrativos. Com este estudo, conclui-se que a utilização de um modelo de apoio a tomada de decisão é muito útil. O modelo pode identificar diferenciações significativas entre os projetos e, sem esse método de apoio, o decisor ficaria sem essa informação. Com isso, entende-se que a organização pode ter ganhos significativos com sua utilização.

show abstract

Multi-criteria Decision Making Through Soft Computing and Evolutionary Techniques

Bayraktar

Gupta

2020

Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Time, cost and quality factors should be taken into consideration to increase productivity in production. Innovative approaches and solutions in manufacturing can be obtained by controlling the independent variables affecting these factors. For this reason, the use of optimization techniques based on different algorithm structures is increasing. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tools such as ANN (Artificial neural network), FL (Fuzzy logic), GA (Genetic algorithm), PSO (Particle swarm optimization), GRA (Grey relational analyses), TOPSIS (Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution), PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation), AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), ELECTRE (Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la REaite) and hybrid are commonly used. Particularly, it is preferred in comparative analysis in the literature for optimum parameter determination and prediction of results in machinability studies. Throughout this chapter, research based on the studies on multi-criteria decision-making tools is discussed. Moreover, various characteristics and difference among these tools are also reported.

show abstract

Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry

Cited by 70 publications

References 168 publications

Solutions for Improving the Partnership Between Airport and Airline Companies

Solutions for Improving the Partnership Between Airport and Airline Companies

Modelo de apoio a tomada de decisão na gestão de portfólio de projetos com base em uma abordagem de análise multicritério

Multi-criteria Decision Making Through Soft Computing and Evolutionary Techniques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About