2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Criteria Decision Making techniques for the management of public procurement tenders: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous studies comparing different MCDM techniques (e.g., Mahmoud and Garcia, 2000;Hodgett, 2016;Dotoli et al, 2020), the following features were taken into account to compare the considered MCDM methods:…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Overall Methodological Approach For The DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on previous studies comparing different MCDM techniques (e.g., Mahmoud and Garcia, 2000;Hodgett, 2016;Dotoli et al, 2020), the following features were taken into account to compare the considered MCDM methods:…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Overall Methodological Approach For The DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high number of additional parameters usually increases the time necessary for the implementation of the method, also related to the need for explaining the required parameters to a non-technical user. It usually also increments subjectivity and potential errors, since this information is related to a choice carried out by the user (Dotoli et al, 2020). SAW, WPM and TOPSIS do not require additional parameters: only the scores and the weights of each indicator have to be collected.…”
Section: Additional Parameters Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…erefore, this paper follows the trends in the literature. ere is extensive literature about tender evaluation (also called bidding selection methods) for the selection of the optimal supplier in public procurement [33] with different techniques such as the economic scoring formulas [34], data envelopment analysis [35] or multicriteria decision making [36,37], and where multiple bidders are evaluated on the basis of price and quality [38]. In particular, the most studied public procurement auctions are related to construction, i.e., distribution of bids [39], bidding competitiveness and position performance [40], strategic bidding [41], tender evaluation and contractor selection [42,43], and empirical analysis in countries such as Slovakia [44].…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the quality control of elderly care services, ex ante policy design usually takes the form of standardizing administrative procedures, such as limiting the scope of activities and defining obligations to be followed [22,23]. However, privatization often leads to a decline in transparency and a loss of democratic accountability [24,25]. After the government signs a purchase contract with market-oriented private providers, the government usually cannot accurately observe their actual efforts on quality that are kind of personal information and it's easy to be concealed, so the issue of moral hazard often occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%