Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using the WASPAS Method in Webcam Selection Decision Support Systems

Arisantoso, Arisantoso; Somaida, Mochammad Hasymi; Sanwasih, Mochamad; Shalahudin, Mohammad Imam

doi:10.30865/ijics.v7i1.6001

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sementara itu, agregasi berbobot dari perkalian didapatkan dengan mengalikan nilai yang dinormalisasi dari setiap kriteria, juga dikalikan dengan bobotnya. Nilai akhir dari setiap alternatif dalam metode WASPAS diperoleh dengan menggabungkan hasil dari kedua cara tersebut, dengan proporsi tertentu yang ditentukan berdasarkan konteks keputusan [16]. Secara rinci proses dalam metode WASPAS dijelaskan sebagai berikut:…”

Section: Analisis Alternatif Dengan Metode Waspasunclassified

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor It Maintenance Menggunakan Pendekatan Waspas

Fatmayati,

Riyanto,

Rahmadian

et al. 2024

teknokom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IT maintenance is important for a company because these activities are carried out to maintain and support the optimal performance of a company's IT systems and infrastructure. Generally, selecting an IT maintenance vendor is done by collecting vendor data and then evaluating it based on the desired criteria. This, of course, results in the time it takes to make a choice and makes it difficult to determine the best option. If you choose the wrong IT maintenance vendor, it will result in disrupting the company's stability. This research was conducted with the aim of developing a decision support system that can be used to determine the IT maintenance vendor that best suits their needs and preferences using the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) approach. This method is used to determine the best option through weighted addition and multiplication, producing a final value that reflects the extent to which each option can meet the specified criteria. From the existing case studies, the best alternative was obtained, namely: Microsis (A4) got a preference value of 0.8769, followed by ICT Canopy (A1) with a preference value of 0.8613, Pillar IT (A2) with a preference value of 0.8408, Indocom Niaga (A5) with a preference value of 0.8180, and Sasana Digital (A3) with a preference value of 0.7389. The usability test carried out received a score of 88%, which indicates that the system is suitable for use.

show abstract

Section: Analisis Alternatif Dengan Metode Waspasunclassified

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor It Maintenance Menggunakan Pendekatan Waspas

Fatmayati,

Riyanto,

Rahmadian

et al. 2024

teknokom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another research [2], highlighted the importance of the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method in multi-criteria decision-making. This method combines the strengths of various models.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying IROC Method in Patent Submission Evaluation in Indonesia: A Comparison with MAGIQ and AHP

Ambarsari,

Rahman,

Cholifah

2024

bids

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study applies the Improved Rank Order Centroid (IROC) to the Indonesian patent submission process within a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework. The study evaluates four primary elements in patent assessment: "Patent Description," "Illustration," "Inventor's Ownership Statement," and "Rights Assignment Declaration." Preliminary findings indicate the importance of "Patent Description," followed by the other elements in descending order of significance. The evaluation also encompasses three applicant alternatives, with the Second Applicant emerging as the most favorable. The study further contrasts IROC outcomes with MAGIQ and AHP methodologies. While rank-based techniques like ROC and IROC generally produce similar weight distributions, the AHP method, which employs pairwise comparisons, often displays variations. The research underscores the potential of IROC in determining criterion weights, its comparison within the MAGIQ framework, and its validation through AHP. These insights aim to deepen our understanding of decision-making processes and analysis. The conclusion from comparing IROC results with MAGIQ and AHP indicates that the applicant rankings remain consistent. Therefore, further research is needed to understand the differences between evaluation methods and their impacts and explore the influence of cultural or regional factors in the patent submission process

show abstract

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using the WASPAS Method in Webcam Selection Decision Support Systems

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor It Maintenance Menggunakan Pendekatan Waspas

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor It Maintenance Menggunakan Pendekatan Waspas

Applying IROC Method in Patent Submission Evaluation in Indonesia: A Comparison with MAGIQ and AHP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About