Multi-criteria for Selection of SmartPhone Brands Product using AHP-TOPSIS Method

Abstract

Today's communication is very important to do, this can be done by using communication tools that are currently being used by everyone, none other than SmartPhone, so people are competing to get it. Many found difficulties in choosing a SmartPhone Brand Product that suits the wishes of each user from a number of alternatives such as Advance, Xiaomi, OPPO, SAMSUNG, and VIVO, because many criteria must be considered such as memory capacity, battery durability, sharpness of capture camera, the form of design producy, the number of features produced from the product, which is equally important is the overall performance of the product. This difficulty is a general matter discussed by each user, because it requires the best solution that can be used to solve the problem. One method that can be used to select the right SmartPhone is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method combined with the TOPSIS method. In this case AHP is used to determine the preference quantity in weighting and TOPSIS is used for mathematical detailed calculations of a number of criteria specified in ranking from a number of alternatives. The results obtained based on the mathematical calculation process are the first rank brand products with the highest weight of 0.597 from SAMSUNG, followed by a weight of 0.586 from OPPO, then weighing 0.555 from Advance, then weighing 0.511 from VIVO, and the smallest weight 0.491 from Xiaomi.

AHP-TOPSIS: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method With Hierarchical Weighting to Determine Priorities for Leak Work Drinking Water Pipe

“…Several previous studies have succeeded in combining the AHP and TOPSIS methods in decision making (Al Azis et al, 2017;Du & Gao, 2020;Santika & Handika, 2019). Combining the AHP and TOPSIS methods can produce more objective rankings quickly and precisely, by combining the AHP and TOPSIS methods, it can produce better recommendations (Akmaludin & Badrul, 2019;Berdie et al, 2017;Y. W. Du & Gao, 2020;Hanine et al, 2016;Jatiningrum et al, 2022;Santika & Handika, 2019).…”

Penerapan Metode Multycreteria Decsion Making Untuk Menentukan Handphone Android 4G Low-End

“…(Paramita et al, 2017). Metode AHP membantu dalam menentukan prioritas dari beberapa kriteria (Akmaludin & Badrul, 2019)dengan melakukan analisa perbandingan berpasangan (Pairwise Comparison) dari masing-masing kriteria. Proses matematis pada AHP secara umum adalah menentukan preferensi pada setiap tingkat hierarki.…”

Synergizing AHP and SMART: An Integrated Decision Support System for Best Employee Selection

“…To improve decision support, the AHP method is frequently integrated with other approaches. Combining the AHP method has been used in several studies, including choosing smartphone purchases using the AHP-VIKOR combination [15], assisting in loan decisions using the AHP and TOPSIS combination [16], choosing wind farm installation locations using the AHP and TOPSIS in Eastern Macedonia and the Thrace region of Greece [17], and combining the AHP and MILP methods. for making strategic decisions in designing global supply chain networks [18], for selecting digital technology using a combination of fuzzy logic and AHP [19], for determining cooperative lending using a combination of AHP, BORDA, and TOPSIS methods [20], and many other topics.…”

“…It has been demonstrated that using AHP in conjunction with the SMART technique improves decision support. These two approaches have been blended in several prior studies, including those that dealt with grading systems [21], employee performance rewards and penalties [22], employee promotions [23], supplier selection [24][25], and many more. This reseacrh attempts to combine AHP and SMART in this situation to create a decision support system for hiring the best candidates.…”