2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.09.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-detection of corticosteroids in sports doping and veterinary control using high-resolution liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
39
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LC-MS methods for CC and anabolic steroids in horse urine [19] have also been developed. A LC-TOF-MS method for CC in human and animal urine has also been reported [20]. Although, LC-MS technique is sensitive and can give reliable results, it requires high operating cost and is not available in all laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…LC-MS methods for CC and anabolic steroids in horse urine [19] have also been developed. A LC-TOF-MS method for CC in human and animal urine has also been reported [20]. Although, LC-MS technique is sensitive and can give reliable results, it requires high operating cost and is not available in all laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Four mass spectrometry analyzers that have been introduced as potential workhorses for this type of analysis are magnetic sector [6,8], Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTMS) [7,11], quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) [4,9,12,13], and time-of-flight (TOF) [14,15] mass analyzers. More recently, the Orbitrap [16,17] has been demonstrated to perform exceptionally well as an accurate mass instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, quadrupole TOF instruments are more readily available, less expensive, and easily coupled with chromatography, but of slightly lower mass accuracy as well (only 25% of measurements Յ1 ppm in one study) [10,20]. Finally, TOF instruments are the most widely available, least expensive, and easily coupled with chromatography, but suffer from the lowest published mass accuracy, usually at or about Ϯ5 ppm [16] with an inter-laboratory comparison showing that 24% of measurements on TOF instruments yielding Ն10 ppm mass accuracy [10]. Further, automation of accurate mass analyses using ESI-TOFMS has been difficult due to dead time effects on the time-to-digital conversion (TDC) circuitry that results in peak shifts to lower masses at high sample concentrations [15,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is especially recommended because of its high resolution and excellent retention time repeatability [15]. Benefits of the UHPLC approach have been experimentally highlighted using fast duty cycle mass analysers such as triple quadrupole or timeof-flight (TOF) mass spectrometers in the anti-doping field [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%