2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10707-004-5622-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Dimensional Scattered Ranking Methods for Geographic Information Retrieval*

Abstract: Geographic Information Retrieval is concerned with retrieving documents in response to a spatially related query. This paper addresses the ranking of documents by both textual and spatial relevance. To this end, we introduce multi-dimensional scattered ranking, where textually and spatially similar documents are ranked spread in the list, instead of consecutively. The effect of this is that documents close together in the ranked list have less redundant information. We present various ranking methods of this t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevance in traditional web search is well-understood [22], even along multiple dimensions [2]. Geographic digital libraries [1,5,19] use geospatial metadata (e.g., coordinate representations of geographic objects) to support storage and retrieval of geographic information. A document's relevance may be computed in terms of its geospatial metadata's topological relation to a query (e.g., size, shape, location, distance) in addition to its content's relation to a search query [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevance in traditional web search is well-understood [22], even along multiple dimensions [2]. Geographic digital libraries [1,5,19] use geospatial metadata (e.g., coordinate representations of geographic objects) to support storage and retrieval of geographic information. A document's relevance may be computed in terms of its geospatial metadata's topological relation to a query (e.g., size, shape, location, distance) in addition to its content's relation to a search query [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We guarantee that this value is 1.0 or less in order to make the integration of both spatial and textual relevances easier. In [35] both spatial and textual relevances are also normalized to values between 0 and 1. Finally, we compute the relevance of the document d with respect to the query q as the maximum relevance due to any location name (Equation 1).…”
Section: Pure Spatial Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example we use here actually uses coordinates which were stored in the police archive along with the data used in case 2. Van Kreveld et al (2005) consider the situation where a document is matched both according to its topicality and 28/36 also distance and consider these to be two dimensions of matching which can be represented visually. Here we consider only the geographical dimension of the problem but accept that the analysis performed in this case and case 2 would need to be integrated at some stage.…”
Section: Case 3: Suspect Prioritisation Based On Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%