2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addlet.2021.100024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-faceted monitoring of powder flow rate variability in directed energy deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to a process control to ensure the layer height in a LMD-w process, a coaxial OCT (optical coherence tomography) system was used in [158]. In [159], laser measurements were used for optical powder flow analysis as well as coaxial molten pool detection to identify powder feed irregularities in the LMD-p process. A special in-situ microscope for observing selective laser sintering was presented in [160].…”
Section: Measuring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to a process control to ensure the layer height in a LMD-w process, a coaxial OCT (optical coherence tomography) system was used in [158]. In [159], laser measurements were used for optical powder flow analysis as well as coaxial molten pool detection to identify powder feed irregularities in the LMD-p process. A special in-situ microscope for observing selective laser sintering was presented in [160].…”
Section: Measuring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The powder used was gas atomised 316 L steel powder from Sandvik (referred to here as GA316), at a flow rate of 7.2 ± 1.3 g/min (Freeman et al, 2021). The powder had a nominal size range of 45-90 µm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant 12bit images (500 x 500 px, where 1 px = 5.4 µm) were analysed in MATLAB R2021b (Mathworks Inc). For each image, all the pixels were summed to give an overall thermal intensity as previously reported 21,35 ; this is a sum of pixel digital levels, so is unitless. This was compared to both the maximum intensity in a single image and to the melt pool area, both showing strong correlation below a thermal intensity of 0.2x10 7 34 , below which, the laser power was ramping at the ends of each hatch.…”
Section: Manufacturing and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%