2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-factor modeling of above-ground biomass in alpine grassland: A case study in the Three-River Headwaters Region, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
76
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the gaps between potential and actual productivity differed regionally, which may reflect differences in alpine grassland types that are dominated by different plant species [37,40]. Similarly, Liang et al [41] found that alpine grassland biomass in the pastoral area of southern Qinghai Province, a region in the central-eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, shows considerable spatial heterogeneity because of the geographical, topographical, climatic and biophysical limitations. In this study, NPP gap was included in the assessment framework for evaluating the relative contributions of climate change and grazing activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We found the gaps between potential and actual productivity differed regionally, which may reflect differences in alpine grassland types that are dominated by different plant species [37,40]. Similarly, Liang et al [41] found that alpine grassland biomass in the pastoral area of southern Qinghai Province, a region in the central-eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, shows considerable spatial heterogeneity because of the geographical, topographical, climatic and biophysical limitations. In this study, NPP gap was included in the assessment framework for evaluating the relative contributions of climate change and grazing activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Elevation was regarded as a key topographical factor influencing the growth of vegetation [58]. The elevation data were acquired from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission with a spatial resolution of 30 m.…”
Section: Climate and Topography Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) incorporate new remote sensing observation techniques (e.g., hyperspectral imagery and the UAV remote sensing technique) and strengthen research on the spectral characteristics of the grassland vegetation community and the applications of the narrow band remote sensing vegetation index in monitoring grassland AGB [47,48]; and (4) construct multi-factor grassland AGB estimation models based on statistical analysis and machine learning techniques. These multiple factors include climatic factors (e.g., sunlight, temperature and rainfall), soil factors (e.g., soil nutrients, soil structure and fertility), biological factors (e.g., grassland type, species richness and distribution of malignant weeds) and management factors (e.g., pasture, fencing enclosures and rotational grazing) [49][50][51]. For example, Li et al (2013) used neural networks to build an AGB model based on multiple MODIS vegetation indices and showed higher accuracy than a model based on a single index, by decreased RMSE of 433 kg/ha and increased R 2 of 0.35 [49].…”
Section: Limitations and Prospects Of Remote Sensing Monitoring Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Li et al (2013) used neural networks to build an AGB model based on multiple MODIS vegetation indices and showed higher accuracy than a model based on a single index, by decreased RMSE of 433 kg/ha and increased R 2 of 0.35 [49]. A multi-factor model by Liang et al (2016) showed decreased RMSE by 14.5% as compared with the optimum single-factor model [50]. Diouf et al (2016) studied the semi-arid grassland in the Sahel region and indicated that a combined photosynthetic radiation and meteorological data model had better performance (R 2 = 0.69 and RMSE = 483 kg DW/ha) than the single-factor model of photosynthetic radiation or meteorological data (R 2 = 0.63 and 0.55 and RMSE = 550 kg DW/ha and 585 kg DW/ha, respectively) [51].…”
Section: Limitations and Prospects Of Remote Sensing Monitoring Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%