2019
DOI: 10.3788/aos201939.0815003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Feature Background Modeling Algorithm Based on Improved Census Transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the matching cost computation methods mainly include the normalized mutual correlation method, the absolute differences (AD) method and non-parametric transforms such as rank and Census, but these methods are prone to be disturbed by illumination distortion and noise in complex environments. The Census transform is more resistant to illumina-FIGURE 12 Comparison of the average mismatching rate for the three kinds of regions of the corresponding algorithm tion distortion and noise and has good robustness in comparison with other methods. However, the Census transform has slightly poor matching results in weak-textured regions, and the AD algorithm, which uses the average difference in RGB channels as the matching cost, can compensate for this drawback.…”
Section: Computation Of the Initial Matching Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the matching cost computation methods mainly include the normalized mutual correlation method, the absolute differences (AD) method and non-parametric transforms such as rank and Census, but these methods are prone to be disturbed by illumination distortion and noise in complex environments. The Census transform is more resistant to illumina-FIGURE 12 Comparison of the average mismatching rate for the three kinds of regions of the corresponding algorithm tion distortion and noise and has good robustness in comparison with other methods. However, the Census transform has slightly poor matching results in weak-textured regions, and the AD algorithm, which uses the average difference in RGB channels as the matching cost, can compensate for this drawback.…”
Section: Computation Of the Initial Matching Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local stereo matching algorithm [6][7][8] outperforms the global stereo matching algorithm [9,10] in terms of real-time performance, but its matching accuracy is reduced [11]. In the local stereo matching algorithm, the Census transform used in the matching cost computation stage is more resistant and robust to illumination distortion [12], which is suitable for complex working environments, but the matching results for weak-textured regions are slightly worse and overly depend on the central pixel. A large number of scholars have made relevant improvements for the Census transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Census transform typically takes the left image as the reference image, extracts the gray information within the neighborhood window of the center point, and uses this as a measure to find the corresponding points in the right image. It is a classical local stereo matching algorithm [15]. Now, Census transform is widely applied in real-time applications involving 3D measurements because of its fast-running speed, speedy performance, resilience to variations in illumination and ease of implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%