2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-focus image fusion based on non-negative sparse representation and patch-level consistency rectification

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the different feature extraction and fusion strategies, these methods can be classified into conventional fusion methods and end-to-end deep learning methods. According to the hand-crafted feature decomposition and generation rules, conventional fusion methods mainly consist of multiscale transform-based [10], sparse representation-based [11][12][13], saliency-based [14][15][16][17], fuzzy set-based [18][19][20], and hybridbased [21][22][23] methods. To summarize, conventional methods for image fusion typically comprise three primary stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the different feature extraction and fusion strategies, these methods can be classified into conventional fusion methods and end-to-end deep learning methods. According to the hand-crafted feature decomposition and generation rules, conventional fusion methods mainly consist of multiscale transform-based [10], sparse representation-based [11][12][13], saliency-based [14][15][16][17], fuzzy set-based [18][19][20], and hybridbased [21][22][23] methods. To summarize, conventional methods for image fusion typically comprise three primary stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%