2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14148768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Fracture Synchronous Propagation Mechanism of Multi-Clustered Fracturing in Interlayered Tight Sandstone Reservoir

Abstract: A numerical model was established by using the 3D lattice method to investigate the synchronous propagation mechanism of multiple clusters of hydraulic fractures in interlayered tight sandstone reservoirs in the Songliao Basin in China. The multi-fracture synchronous propagation model under different geological factors and fracturing engineering factors was simulated. The results show that the vertical stress difference, interlayer Young’s modulus, and lithologic interface strength are positively correlated wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the fracturing cluster spacing was reduced to 6 m (Figure 13d), the maximum fracture widths generated by HF and GF were increased to 2.232 cm and 2.881 cm, respectively. Although the inter-cluster fractures of HF were denser, the undersized cluster spacing limits its production area; this is fundamentally consistent with previous research [55]. However, compared with HF, GF can generate fractures that gradually extend to the far position from the horizontal well to expand the stimulation range effectively.…”
Section: Results Of Hf and Gf Under Different Irssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When the fracturing cluster spacing was reduced to 6 m (Figure 13d), the maximum fracture widths generated by HF and GF were increased to 2.232 cm and 2.881 cm, respectively. Although the inter-cluster fractures of HF were denser, the undersized cluster spacing limits its production area; this is fundamentally consistent with previous research [55]. However, compared with HF, GF can generate fractures that gradually extend to the far position from the horizontal well to expand the stimulation range effectively.…”
Section: Results Of Hf and Gf Under Different Irssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The total fluid leakage part contains the seepage into the upper and lower surface along the fracture in any section, and its behavior is determined by where p t and p b are the pore pressure, and c t and c b are the corresponding leak-off coefficients. Substituting eqs and into eq , the Reynolds’ lubrication is written as And the mass conservation equation of fluid flow in the porous matrix is given by where ϕ is the porosity of the matrix, ρ m is the fluid density, κ is the permeability, and μ is the fluid dynamic viscosity.…”
Section: Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%