2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.11.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-GPUs parallel computation of dendrite growth in forced convection using the phase-field-lattice Boltzmann model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 dq dp PFLBM and PFM correspond to the simulations shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b), respectively [14]. Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 dq dp PFLBM and PFM correspond to the simulations shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b), respectively [14]. Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Dendrite morphological changes during growth of an equiaxed dendrite (a) with and (b) without forced convection[14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires large computational cost. Therefore, we have developed a parallel GPU scheme for a coupling model of phase‐field and lattice Boltzmann methods to accelerate the dendrite growth simulation in the presence of the liquid flow . Here, we employed the lattice Boltzmann method for solving the liquid flow because it has a great advantage in parallel computing due to the easily implemented method.…”
Section: Large‐scale Phase‐field Simulation Of Solidification and Gramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial locality, a linear advection term, no Poisson solver for pressure, and relative ease of imposing complex boundaries and coupling with other numerical solvers are some of the LBM advantages over conventional computational fluid dynamics methods and are the reason for its use in many applications 4-6 . Because of the locality property, the method can be massively parallelized for speed‐up on modern computing architectures 7-11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular one is the bounce‐back scheme, where particles collide with the wall and reverse their momentum. It is widely and effectively used in applications with complex geometries 7-11,17-19 due to its efficiency, simplicity, and second‐order accuracy when the boundary is placed midway between gridpoints, and first‐order otherwise. However, it has some drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%