Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment at Community Level Integrating Local and Scientific Knowledge in the Hodh Chargui, Mauritania

Abstract

Hydro-climatic risk assessments at the regional scale are of little use in the risk treatment decision-making process when they are only based on local or scientific knowledge and when they deal with a single risk at a time. Local and scientific knowledge can be combined in a multi-hazard risk assessment to contribute to sustainable rural development. The aim of this article was to develop a multi-hazard risk assessment at the regional scale which classifies communities according to the risk level, proposes risk treatment actions, and can be replicated in the agropastoral, semi-arid Tropics. The level of multi-hazard risk of 13 communities of Hodh Chargui (Mauritania) exposed to meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural drought, as well as heavy precipitations, was ascertained with an index composed of 48 indicators representing hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity. Community meetings and visits to exposed items enabled specific indicators to be identified. Scientific knowledge was used to determine the hazard with Climate Hazards Group Infra-Red Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS) and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) datasets, Landsat images, and the method used to rank the communities. The northern communities are at greater risk of agricultural drought and those at the foot of the uplands are more at risk of heavy rains and consequent flash floods. The assessment proposes 12 types of actions to treat the risk in the six communities with severe and high multi-hazard risk.

Exploring the integration of local and scientific knowledge in early warning systems for disaster risk reduction: a review

“…Similarly, the identified forms of integration in this study also represent different forms of integration connected to discussions about 'ladders' in citizen science, coproduction, or participatory approach literature. Noticeable is that rarely concrete models of integration are given (Mercer et al 2010;Gaillard and Mercer 2012;Hiwasaki et al 2014;Kniveton et al 2015;Tiepolo et al 2019), where the process of integration is outlined. This challenges our ability to establish an explicit 'ladder of integration' here, but we can identify extremes.…”

Tsunami Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Banda Aceh City through ArcGIS Software

“…Exposure is the presence of people, livelihoods, species or ecosystems, environmental functions, services, and resources, infrastructure, or economic, social, or cultural assets in places and settings that could be adversely affected. Adaptive or coping capacity is the ability of systems, institutions, humans and other organisms to adjust to potential damage, to take advantage of opportunities, or to respond to consequences [10] The characteristics of vulnerability determined by physical, social, economic and environmental factors or processes which increase the susceptibility of an individual, a community, assets or systems to the impacts of hazards [5]…”

The relationship between multiple hazards and deprivation using open geospatial data and machine learning

“…Commonly, cities are affected by more than one hazard, and the frequency of disasters is reportedly increasing (Dilley et al 2005;Tiepolo et al 2019;van Westen & Greiving 2017). However, studies on multiple hazards in cities have been limited as research usually focuses on single hazards (e.g., Wang et al 2019a, b, c).…”