Multi hazard vulnerability analysis: The casualty model and its implementation

Eshrati, Leila; Mahmoudzadeh, Amir; Taghvaei, M

doi:10.4103/2347-9019.157411

Cited by 15 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To assess and presents the hazard interactions, different tools are generally used [9]. Among them: the hazard matrix, fault trees [10]; multi-criteria analysis [11][12][13]; the negotiated choice; the implementation of a multi-scale GIS (Global Information System) and statistical modelling of vulnerability including temporal variability [14] are used to assess the multihazards. Additionally, the experts opinion and feedback are generally used to assess the interaction between hazards (Figure 1).…”

Section: Hazard Interaction Identification and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Mining Risk Management and multi-hazard approaches, methodology and application

Al Heib,

Degas,

Lecomte

et al. 2024

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After intensively exploiting the mineral resources of its subsoil for several centuries, French mining sites have gradually closed. The “post-mining” of a site mine is concerned by many hazards which can occur such as: ground movement phenomena (subsidence, collapses), rising gas, irreversible disruptions in underground water circulation induced by mining can potentially cause disturbances, both in terms of water circulation patterns (Flooding in low areas, disruption of waterway flows) and water quality (pollution). The multi-hazards assessment methodology consists of four steps: the identification and the assessment of the singles hazards, the identification of the potential hazard interactions, the identification of the level and the consequences of the interactions and the finally the adjustment and the mapping of the hazard interaction. The matrix tool and interaction organigrams are used to identify the potential interactions. The paper presents the methodology for the interaction between two main hazards: flooding and ground movement. The interaction methodology was applied on two case studies: shallow chalk mine and deep coal mine (France). The results demonstrate the importance of multi-hazard assessment. This analysis depends on the quality and the quantity of existing data for carrying out the multi-hazard assessment.

show abstract

Section: Hazard Interaction Identification and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Mining Risk Management and multi-hazard approaches, methodology and application

Al Heib,

Degas,

Lecomte

et al. 2024

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Through a combination of intuitive Boolean searches and snowballing of the benchmark papers we identified five additional relevant papers to complement the search, including three recent works that had been published after our search in 2021 (Zhuo and Han, 2016; Eshrati, Mahmoudzadeh, and Taghvaei, 2019; De Angeli et al, 2022; Drakes and Tate, 2022; IPCC, 2022). In total, we included 45 papers for analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualising multiple hazards and cascading effects on critical infrastructures

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite increased research on ‘multiple hazards’ and ‘cascading effects’, ambiguity remains concerning terminology. This paper reviews the literature to explore how these two concepts are defined in relation to critical infrastructures and their vital societal functions. Next, it investigates how the concepts are operationalised in Swedish disaster risk management. Findings indicate that regardless of a wealth of methodologies assessing multiple hazards and their cascading effects, these are rarely used by local planners, suggesting a gap between scientific approaches and practical implementation. Research mainly captures multiple hazards and cascading effects through technical parameters related to the severity of a hazard or the direct physical impacts on infrastructure. Less focus has been placed on the wider or knock‐on effects across sectors and how these translate into societal risk. Future research should move beyond traditional understandings of social vulnerabilities as only pre‐existing, to analyse how cascading effects on infrastructure and services can put new social groups at risk.

show abstract

“…A multi-hazard risk assessment approach also suggests where more in-depth research needs to be done and enables the identification of the places that are most in danger [27]. Communities need multi-hazard assessments more and more as exposures change over time.…”

Section: Multi-hazard Risk Assessment Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural and Non-structural Measures Integration through Multi-hazard Risk Approach - Sohag Governorate as an Example

Seddeek

2023

SVU-International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Applicati

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Egypt, as a developing country, has a long history of facing natural risks. In most cases, the authorities depend on the reactive approach instead of the proactive one, which is the core of disaster risk management. This makes the structural measures to deal with the natural risks the main step without looking at the non-structural measures like land-use control and risk management planning. As a trial to help such countries enhance the application of disaster risk management, two cornerstones will be suggested: the first is the integration of structural and non-structural measures, and the second is the use of a multi-hazard risk approach. This approach will help to avoid single-risk measures by mapping all correlated risks and creating a risk zone map, guiding future planning strategies, and controlling land-use to avoid social and economic loss and mitigate the negative effect in the event of an unpredictable hazard. The application for the Sohag governorate at the regional level confirms the absence of risk management in the regional plans due to many imbalances, the most important of which is the failure to define the risk zones and match the suggested future land-use with the level of risks.

show abstract

Multi hazard vulnerability analysis: The casualty model and its implementation

Cited by 15 publications

References 3 publications

Post-Mining Risk Management and multi-hazard approaches, methodology and application

Post-Mining Risk Management and multi-hazard approaches, methodology and application

Conceptualising multiple hazards and cascading effects on critical infrastructures

Structural and Non-structural Measures Integration through Multi-hazard Risk Approach - Sohag Governorate as an Example

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About