2021 IEEE/ACIS 19th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icis51600.2021.9516865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Hop Reasoning for Question Answering with Knowledge Graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SimpleQuestions (Bordes et al, 2015) one needs to extract just a single fact from the KG to answer a question. MetaQA (Zhang et al, 2017) and WebQuestionsSP (Yih et al, 2015) require multi-hop reasoning, where one must traverse over multiple edges in the KG to reach the answer. ComplexWebQuestions (Talmor and Berant, 2018) contains both multi-hop and conjunction/comparison type questions.…”
Section: Temporal Qa Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In SimpleQuestions (Bordes et al, 2015) one needs to extract just a single fact from the KG to answer a question. MetaQA (Zhang et al, 2017) and WebQuestionsSP (Yih et al, 2015) require multi-hop reasoning, where one must traverse over multiple edges in the KG to reach the answer. ComplexWebQuestions (Talmor and Berant, 2018) contains both multi-hop and conjunction/comparison type questions.…”
Section: Temporal Qa Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these templates has a corresponding procedure that could be executed over the temporal KG to extract all possible answers for that template. However, similar to Zhang et al (2017), we chose not to make this procedure a part of the dataset, to remove unwelcome dependence of QA systems on such formal candidate collection methods. This also allows easy augmentation of the dataset, since only question-answer pairs are needed.…”
Section: Temporal Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Semantic Parsing and Multi-task Learning Approaches Our work lies in the areas of semantic parsing and neural approaches for question answering over KGs. Works in [6,15,31,16] use neural approaches to solve the task of QA. [15] introduces an approach that splits the question into spans of tokens to match the tokens to their respective entities and predicates in the KG.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a relational phrase and two entities, one has to find the best KG path that connects these entities. This paradigm has been extended to multi-hop QA [48,76]. While Conqer is inspired by some of these settings, the ConvQA problem is very different, with multiple entities from where agents could potentially walk and missing entities and relations in the conversational utterances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%