2016
DOI: 10.17775/cseejpes.2016.00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-indicator inference scheme for fuzzy assessment of power system transient stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A power system is usually subjected to deviations from the nominal operating conditions due to load variations and the occurrence of faults. A multi-indicator inference scheme is proposed for fast prediction of transient stability levels of a power system [43]. Transient stability is assessed by a set of transient indicators such as the integral generator speed index (IGSA) [44], wide-area severity induces or the accelerating rate of the generator under the COI reference.…”
Section: Transient Stability Assessment Using Generatorbased Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A power system is usually subjected to deviations from the nominal operating conditions due to load variations and the occurrence of faults. A multi-indicator inference scheme is proposed for fast prediction of transient stability levels of a power system [43]. Transient stability is assessed by a set of transient indicators such as the integral generator speed index (IGSA) [44], wide-area severity induces or the accelerating rate of the generator under the COI reference.…”
Section: Transient Stability Assessment Using Generatorbased Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-fault responses of power angles, rotor speeds and accelerating powers of generators, and voltage magnitudes of buses contain key information relating to transient stability. Numerous severity indicators have been proposed for stability assessment [18,[23][24][25][26]. In this paper, 14 kinds of indicators are proposed to form the multidimensional space of input features.…”
Section: Response-based Severity Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ + and µ -were selected as 1.32 × 10 -4 m 2 /(V·s) and 1.65 × 10 -4 m 2 /(V·s). 22 The diagrammatic sketch of the conductors with sag in the calculation model from the front view is shown in Fig.11. The change trend of the conductors at the axial direction was approximately parabolic in the corona cage.…”
Section: Corona-loss Analysis Of Bundle-sag Conductors In the Ultmentioning
confidence: 99%