2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-label classification methods for improving comorbidities identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, MTL assumes that every example (patient) is associated with all tasks (diseases), while MLL allows each example (patient) to be associated with a subset of labels (diseases) [54], making MLL a more general model. Hence, most previous works on MDPA have used MLL models [39,42,49,57].…”
Section: Multi-disease Predictive Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, MTL assumes that every example (patient) is associated with all tasks (diseases), while MLL allows each example (patient) to be associated with a subset of labels (diseases) [54], making MLL a more general model. Hence, most previous works on MDPA have used MLL models [39,42,49,57].…”
Section: Multi-disease Predictive Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these works focused on mortality or readmission prediction, with few focusing on complications of heart failure. Wosiak et al proposed a multilabel classification technique for comorbidities identification, which is a general model for all kinds of diseases [19]. Xiang et al proposed a multi-task framework that can jointly predict the risk of multiple related diseases, and the method was tested on patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [20].…”
Section: Related Work a Heart Failure Outcomes Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%