2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-6764-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-language online handwriting recognition based on beta-elliptic model and hybrid TDNN-SVM classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained remains valid even though it is compared to hybridized classifier (98.53% with SVM vs. 96.45% with MLP-HMM, 90% with BCP-LSTM). However, we inferred that our system lost its first place against two recent systems [13,47] with a recognition rate around 100% for both. This can be accounted for in terms of using multi-language data set (contained scripts not only from ADAB data sets) as well as different sets on training and testing(different sets from ADAB) in Refs.…”
Section: • Comparison With State Of Art Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained remains valid even though it is compared to hybridized classifier (98.53% with SVM vs. 96.45% with MLP-HMM, 90% with BCP-LSTM). However, we inferred that our system lost its first place against two recent systems [13,47] with a recognition rate around 100% for both. This can be accounted for in terms of using multi-language data set (contained scripts not only from ADAB data sets) as well as different sets on training and testing(different sets from ADAB) in Refs.…”
Section: • Comparison With State Of Art Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…From the obtained results, we can infer how promising our system performance is compared to the state of-the-art systems. First of all, ten different [42] Geometric parameters + Fourier descriptors HMM 85.37 Khlif [43] Online + offline feature HMM 93.33 Hamdi [44] Beta-elliptic model MLP 95.14 Elleuch [45] Online + offline feature SVM 91.8 Abdelaziz [46] Geometric features HMM 97.13 Akouadi [28] Beta parameters + perceptual codes BCP + LSTM 90 Zouari [47] Beta-elliptic parameters TDNN-SVM 100 Maalej [13] x classifier/feature combinations were tried on different sets of ADAB data set. The comparison reveals that our method has much better performance than some approaches relying on a single classifier (98.53% with SVM-based classifier(our approach) vs. 95.14% with MLP and 91.8% with SVM).…”
Section: • Comparison With State Of Art Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, several researches focus specifically on mono-language script, for instance, Arabic [12], Chinese [7], Tamil [31], Japanese [26] etc. Similarly, there exist multi-script and multi-language systems for online handwriting recognition like those presented in [32], [33] as well as other commercial systems such as those developed by Apple [34] and Microsoft [29] organizations.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM is considered a powerful tool for linear and nonlinear classification based on a supervised learning algorithm. It has shown high success in many practical applications such as pattern recognition [36]. Contrary to traditionally artificial neural networks, the basic formulation of SVM is the structural risk minimization instead of empirical risk.…”
Section: Svm Enginementioning
confidence: 99%