2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-layer architecture for realization of network virtualization using MPLS technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on protection is on-going to ensure that networks can promptly react to failures. SDN is also [21] 2018 further improved the load balancing and resource utilisation of the network with SDN Huang et al [23] 2018 overcame the label space reduction problem in MPLS network Guo et al [20] 2017 improved measurement error issues when using the single traffic matrix Mazhin et al [24] 2017 improved network flexibility MPLS-TE Premkumar and Saminadan. [2] 2017 enhanced network resiliency for sensitive protection data MPLS DiffServ Eugen [5] 2017 presented simulation results that proved the benefits of DiffServ in terms of delay integration of MPLS-TP Kurimoto et al [6] 2017 reconfigurable optical adddrop multiplexers to create nationwide burden with SDN Kurimoto et al [37] 2016 intra-and inter-domain network-enabled generic model transport for SDN and MPLS-TP network Lim et al [36] 2016 automatic topology discovery in the MPLS-TP network MPLS-TP protection Kim et al [44] 2018 achieved fast traffic recovery and relieved the communication burden Kolhar et al [40] 2016 reduced fault recovery time by 27 ms and decreased traffic load Blair et al [42] 2016 achieved 50 ms protection switching time Bächli et al [43] 2016 achieved guaranteed performance for critical application even under extreme conditions Choi [48] 2016 significant growth of data buffer hit ratio Kim et al [55] 2016 network availability subject to the maximised subprotection switching time of 50 ms Pijanka and Rózański.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on protection is on-going to ensure that networks can promptly react to failures. SDN is also [21] 2018 further improved the load balancing and resource utilisation of the network with SDN Huang et al [23] 2018 overcame the label space reduction problem in MPLS network Guo et al [20] 2017 improved measurement error issues when using the single traffic matrix Mazhin et al [24] 2017 improved network flexibility MPLS-TE Premkumar and Saminadan. [2] 2017 enhanced network resiliency for sensitive protection data MPLS DiffServ Eugen [5] 2017 presented simulation results that proved the benefits of DiffServ in terms of delay integration of MPLS-TP Kurimoto et al [6] 2017 reconfigurable optical adddrop multiplexers to create nationwide burden with SDN Kurimoto et al [37] 2016 intra-and inter-domain network-enabled generic model transport for SDN and MPLS-TP network Lim et al [36] 2016 automatic topology discovery in the MPLS-TP network MPLS-TP protection Kim et al [44] 2018 achieved fast traffic recovery and relieved the communication burden Kolhar et al [40] 2016 reduced fault recovery time by 27 ms and decreased traffic load Blair et al [42] 2016 achieved 50 ms protection switching time Bächli et al [43] 2016 achieved guaranteed performance for critical application even under extreme conditions Choi [48] 2016 significant growth of data buffer hit ratio Kim et al [55] 2016 network availability subject to the maximised subprotection switching time of 50 ms Pijanka and Rózański.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the benefits of separating the control and data planes, as implemented in SDN or network virtualisation, one shortcoming still exists; the lack of rapid and reliable implementation prevents the network from growing to its desired capabilities. In an effort to improve this, Mazhin et al integrated MPLS with network virtualisation in their work [24]. This architecture can expand Internet flexibility and pave the way for the development and commercialisation of network virtualisation and next-generation MPLS.…”
Section: Software-defined Network For Mpls-tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tunnels are opened based on aggregation, classification and prioritization of communication between peer robots. MPLS also enables network virtualization through the labeling or tagging method, in order to create virtual and physical layers [26] that leverage the implementation of energy-aware traffic engineering [27]. The TQS protocol proposed is applied in the same manner as the MPLS label stack entry (LSE) shown in Fig.…”
Section: Tag-qos Switching Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label swapping concept in MPLS allows dynamic tunnel depending on traffic demand, which allows to be manipulated for aggregation, classification, and prioritization. On the other hand, MPLS allows network virtualization through labeling or tagging method in order to create virtual and physical layers that leverage to the energy‐aware traffic engineering implementation …”
Section: Switching and Routing Protocols Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%