2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-layered shielding materials for high energy space radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost of aluminum shielding depends on several factors (e.g., market, method of production, and geometry configuration of spacecraft), and the decision on the shielding material and value would also include the reduction of absorbed doses and other engineering issues (Wilson et al 1998;Sager 1992;Adams et al 2005). It should also be noted that hydrogen-rich materials (polyethylene, lithium hydride, and water) may be more suitable than aluminum for radiation mitigation, as they have higher values of mass stopping power and are more efficient in stopping neutrons due to nuclear elastic scattering Durante 2014;Naito et al 2020;Gohel and Makwana 2022). The present, TDRA-based Q-values are in good agreement with both the ICRP Report 60 Recommendations and NASA's model (Tables 1 and 2) despite the quite different methodologies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The cost of aluminum shielding depends on several factors (e.g., market, method of production, and geometry configuration of spacecraft), and the decision on the shielding material and value would also include the reduction of absorbed doses and other engineering issues (Wilson et al 1998;Sager 1992;Adams et al 2005). It should also be noted that hydrogen-rich materials (polyethylene, lithium hydride, and water) may be more suitable than aluminum for radiation mitigation, as they have higher values of mass stopping power and are more efficient in stopping neutrons due to nuclear elastic scattering Durante 2014;Naito et al 2020;Gohel and Makwana 2022). The present, TDRA-based Q-values are in good agreement with both the ICRP Report 60 Recommendations and NASA's model (Tables 1 and 2) despite the quite different methodologies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although aluminum is commonly used in spacecraft, its exposure to GCR can lead to the production of highly penetrating secondary radiation, including neutrons and ions, which can cause electronic failures and adverse biological effects. Hydrogen, with a high charge-to-mass ratio and the absence of neutrons in its nucleus, proves effective in slowing down GCR through direct ionization [10]. Additional considerations could be taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the use of low-Z boron compounds should be preferred to those based on gadolinium in order to avoid the generation of undesired secondary radiation, which has detrimental effects on structural materials and parasitic effects on electronic components. The neutron absorption cross-section for the isotope 10 B is 3835 barns, and enriching boron compounds with 10 B could enhance protection against neutrons [9]. Compounds like boron carbide (B 4 C) and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) in nanomaterial form, particularly nano-B 4 C and nano-hBN dispersed in polymer matrix, have demonstrated enhanced thermal neutron attenuation [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its high ratio of atomic number to atomic mass, hydrogen is regarded as the most effective and fundamental component for radiation shielding. In order to fabricate polymer nanocomposites utilized for radiation shielding [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], the use of polymers with a high level of hydrogen becomes essential. In terms of shielding cosmic radiation, polyvinyl alcohol has numerous advantages, including its formability, high hydrogen content, and cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductıonmentioning
confidence: 99%