“…A series of noble-metal-supported catalysts have been reported in the catalytic oxidation of ethyl acetate, such as Ru/SnO 2 , Ag/LaCoO 3 , Ag/CeO 2 , Au/CeO 2 , Pd/Cr 2 O 3 -ZrO 2 , and Pd/Al 2 O 3 , − and the performance of noble-metal-supported catalysts is significantly improved compared with that of certain supports because the strong metal–support interactions (SMSIs) enhance the surface oxygen vacancies, surface reactive oxygen species, and low-temperature redox ability. Among these noble metals, Pd has more abundant reserves and lower cost than other noble metals and can have a strong interaction with supports, showing high catalytic activity, so it is a critical material for the catalysis of VOCs. − As a stable, richly abundant, and cheap rare earth material, CeO 2 has become a hotspot of support material because of its excellent oxygen storage and release capacity, conversion capacity between valence states, and abundant oxygen vacancy, thus providing surface and pore structure for noble metal dispersions. − Moreover, CeO 2 has morphological diversity, and studies have shown that the morphology of CeO 2 has a significant impact on catalytic activity. − For example, Feng et al prepared three kinds of CeO 2 with different morphologies and found that the concentration of surface oxygen vacancies was affected by the morphology, which led to the difference in catalytic activity. At present, it has been found that the SMSIs on the interface of noble-metal-supported catalysts would significantly influence the activity and stability of the catalysts, , while the effect of support morphology on SMSI needs further research.…”