2012
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2011.649914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-level Governance and EU Structural Funds: An Entrepreneurial Local Government Perspective

Abstract: This article explores some of the underlying forces that provoke local governments to participate in multi-level governance through the creation of networks at the local as well as European level. We focus on the European funding process within local governments to identify some differences in the process between the Italian and the English local government authorities. Subsequently we observe that entrepreneurship theory could assist in untangling and explaining this phenomenon; therefore we explore the EU fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the community is also involved in monitoring the public policy. These findings are consonant with the results of the study conducted by Heinelt & Stolzenberg (2014) and Zerbinati (2012) in that the Village Funds have been managed in an orderly manner, efficiently, economically, effectively, transparently, and responsibly and complied with the legislation by considering a feeling of equity and legitimacy and organizing the interests of the local society. The implementation of the Village Funds have been monitored by the parties related to the Village Funds starting from the appoint-ed mentoring team, the inspectorate, to the community that has participated in watching and monitoring the implementation of the Village Funds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the community is also involved in monitoring the public policy. These findings are consonant with the results of the study conducted by Heinelt & Stolzenberg (2014) and Zerbinati (2012) in that the Village Funds have been managed in an orderly manner, efficiently, economically, effectively, transparently, and responsibly and complied with the legislation by considering a feeling of equity and legitimacy and organizing the interests of the local society. The implementation of the Village Funds have been monitored by the parties related to the Village Funds starting from the appoint-ed mentoring team, the inspectorate, to the community that has participated in watching and monitoring the implementation of the Village Funds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Autonomy at the village level requires supports and development of management systems to encourage broader community involvement. For that reason, the government needs to create an honest, open, responsible, and democratic management pattern (Heinelt & Stolzenberg, 2014;Zerbinati, 2012). The village government must be able to apply the principle of accountability in its governance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the theoretical expectations, the EU funding process is the main underlying force that induces IMC (Zerbinati, 2012). A large majority of IMAs consider that collaboration emerged from the desire to acquire funds, unveiling an accommodation to EU-imposed rules and indicating a purely instrumental view of IMAs.…”
Section: Scope Of Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Central governments in Europe have seen a reduction in their traditional role as sole intermediary between the sub national and supranational level (Zerbinati 2012). Furthermore, difficulties were diagnosed in the policy decision component in terms of the resources available (e.g.…”
Section: Project Difficulties and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%