2015
DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2015.1017445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: an integrative review of research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have reported interview, focus group, and survey studies using different frameworks than that used by Brown. Consequently, major reviews of the research into teacher conceptions of assessment (Barnes et al, 2015;Fulmer et al, 2015;Bonner, 2016;Brown, 2016) have made it clear that teachers are aware of and react to the strong tension between using assessment for improved outcomes and processes in classrooms, and assessment being used to hold teachers and schools accountable for outcomes by employers or funders. The more pressure teachers are under to raise assessment scores, the less likely they are to see assessment as a formative process in which they might discover and experiment with different practices (Brown and Harris, 2009).…”
Section: Conceptions Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have reported interview, focus group, and survey studies using different frameworks than that used by Brown. Consequently, major reviews of the research into teacher conceptions of assessment (Barnes et al, 2015;Fulmer et al, 2015;Bonner, 2016;Brown, 2016) have made it clear that teachers are aware of and react to the strong tension between using assessment for improved outcomes and processes in classrooms, and assessment being used to hold teachers and schools accountable for outcomes by employers or funders. The more pressure teachers are under to raise assessment scores, the less likely they are to see assessment as a formative process in which they might discover and experiment with different practices (Brown and Harris, 2009).…”
Section: Conceptions Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding of Pre-service Teachers' CoA In this paper, CoA refers to "a teacher's understanding of the nature and purpose of how students' learning is examined, tested, evaluated, or assessed" (Brown and Gao, 2015, p. 4). Given that teachers' CoA functions as an interpretive and guiding framework to take in assessment knowledge and as a potent mediator of assessment planning and practice within contextual tensions (Fulmer et al, 2015;Deneen and Brown, 2016;Xu and Brown, 2016), continually expanding and deepening CoA is an essential prerequisite for being an assessment-literate teacher. Compared with the bulk of research on in-service teachers' CoA, studies on pre-service teachers' CoA mainly converge on three themes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In teacher education programs, pre-service teachers' CoAs are found to have changed after they start learning to assess (Smith et al, 2014). Importantly, how teachers conceptualize assessment is found to influence their uptake of assessment knowledge and implementation of assessment practices (Brookhart, 2011;Deneen and Boud, 2014;Barnes et al, 2015;Fulmer et al, 2015). Despite growing recognition of the importance and dynamics of teachers' CoA, the processes and patterns of preservice teachers' CoA change during practicum have not been adequately explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies indicated that students' conceptions of assessment affect the quality of learning (Entwistle and Entwistle 1991;Marton and Säljö 1997;Ramsden 1997) underlining the significance of learners' conceptions of assessment. Studies have shown that teachers' conceptions influence the assessment outcomes and practices (Barnes et al 2015;Fulmer et al 2015). In New Zealand, using the structural equation modeling (SEM), Brown and Hirschfeld (2008) studied secondary school students' (n = 3469) conceptions of assessment.…”
Section: Objective and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%