SAE Technical Paper Series 2019
DOI: 10.4271/2019-24-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Level Modeling of Real Syngas Combustion in a Spark Ignition Engine and Experimental Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the numerical point of view, a proper "digital twin" of the CMD ECO20X system was built and a multi-objective and multi-disciplinary optimization problem was solved through a software platform allowing the integration of different simulation tools. As a first step, a proper simulation model of the CMD ECO20X system was developed through both the Thermoflex TM and the GT-Suite ® one-dimensional simulation tools: the section of production, cooling, and cleaning of the syngas was schematized within a proper Thermoflex TM model [30], while the ICE was modeled in the GT-Suite ® environment [31]. The choice of using two different sub-models was mandatory, as explained in reference [30], to obtain a predictive model of the system performance as the gasifier and engine operating conditions were varied (i.e., the equivalence ratio of the gasifier, the biomass composition, the ICE spark advance, and other governing parameters) [32].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the numerical point of view, a proper "digital twin" of the CMD ECO20X system was built and a multi-objective and multi-disciplinary optimization problem was solved through a software platform allowing the integration of different simulation tools. As a first step, a proper simulation model of the CMD ECO20X system was developed through both the Thermoflex TM and the GT-Suite ® one-dimensional simulation tools: the section of production, cooling, and cleaning of the syngas was schematized within a proper Thermoflex TM model [30], while the ICE was modeled in the GT-Suite ® environment [31]. The choice of using two different sub-models was mandatory, as explained in reference [30], to obtain a predictive model of the system performance as the gasifier and engine operating conditions were varied (i.e., the equivalence ratio of the gasifier, the biomass composition, the ICE spark advance, and other governing parameters) [32].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about the conducted measurement campaign can be found in ref. [20]. The mass fractions of the species composing the different producer gases and their chemical characteristics (stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio α ST and LHV) are reported in Table 3 as deriving from measurements taken on the real system.…”
Section: Technical Characteristics Of the Mchp Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, inert species composing the syngas lower the lower calorific value, hence the amount of primary energy exploitable through combustion at a given mass of fuel, that leads to a power de-rating of the conversion system [20,21]. However, the insulating effects of inert species as N 2 (this last present in the mixture with a mass fraction of even above the 50%) at the cylinder walls, although well-known from literature, are positive in reducing heat losses but have not yet been quantified into detail especially in syngas powered systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combustion phase is modeled through the predictive model named "EngCylCombSITurb" (Hernandez et al, 2005). This approach is preferred to the classical Wiebe function (Heywood, 1988), where the fuel burned mass fraction is defined through a sigmoid-like function, as this last is validated for traditional fuels but it fails for nontraditional ones as for hydrogen-NG blends, whose chemical characteristics and combustion behavior depend upon the volumetric fractions of the components (Caputo et al, 2018;Caputo et al, 2019). The adopted model calculates the laminar speed through the following expression:…”
Section: Engine Model Development and Validation Under Ng Fuelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these parameters are here calculated for each mixture within the Chemkin ™ environment by relying on the detailed kinetic mechanism Gri-Mech 3.0 (Smith et al, 1999), so as to build a more customized combustion model as the hydrogen fraction varies in the fuel mixture. The validation of this approach was previously performed by Caputo et al, 2019, with reference to a ternary mixture of H 2 -CH 4 -CO with respect to experimental measurements under reference conditions. Figure 2 reports the calculated laminar flame speed as a function of the equivalence ratio for NG, hydrogen, and three blends of hydrogen-NG (hydrogen volume fraction at 10, 20, and 30%) at standard pressure and temperature and by varying the fuel-air equivalence ratio.…”
Section: Engine Model Development and Validation Under Ng Fuelingmentioning
confidence: 99%