2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-mechanism damage-plasticity model for semi-crystalline polymer: Creep damage of notched specimen of PA6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage interaction was modelled by a weighted additive impact of different accumulated plastic strains which contradicts other models in the literature where the interaction was modelled by an additive impact of damage variables (Mazars et al, 1990;Chaboche, 1992;Halm and Dragon, 1996;Welemane and Cormery, 2003;Challamel et al, 2005;Cormery and Welemane, 2010;Goidescu et al, 2013;Saï and Cailletaud, 2007;Saï et al, 2011;Saï, 2011). This strong coupling of plasticity and damage may be in contrast to earlier CDM models (Horii and Nemat-Nasser, 1983;Bažant andOh, 1983, 1985;Lemaitre, 1984;Bažant and Prat, 1988a,b;Chaboche, 1992;Lemaitre and Chaboche, 2000;Lemaitre and Desmorat, 2005;Chaboche, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damage interaction was modelled by a weighted additive impact of different accumulated plastic strains which contradicts other models in the literature where the interaction was modelled by an additive impact of damage variables (Mazars et al, 1990;Chaboche, 1992;Halm and Dragon, 1996;Welemane and Cormery, 2003;Challamel et al, 2005;Cormery and Welemane, 2010;Goidescu et al, 2013;Saï and Cailletaud, 2007;Saï et al, 2011;Saï, 2011). This strong coupling of plasticity and damage may be in contrast to earlier CDM models (Horii and Nemat-Nasser, 1983;Bažant andOh, 1983, 1985;Lemaitre, 1984;Bažant and Prat, 1988a,b;Chaboche, 1992;Lemaitre and Chaboche, 2000;Lemaitre and Desmorat, 2005;Chaboche, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Capturing the "unilateral effect" present for instance in concrete (Mazars et al, 1990;Halm and Dragon, 1996;Welemane and Cormery, 2003;Challamel et al, 2005;Cormery and Welemane, 2010;Goidescu et al, 2013) where damage under tension evolves differently than damage under compression or more generally loading mode dependent damage mechanisms remains an open question. For initially anisotropic materials such as bone, the asymmetric behaviour is for instance modelled using spectral decomposition (Schreyer, 1995;Biegler and Mehrabadi, 1995) or by multi-mechanism approaches (Saï and Cailletaud, 2007;Saï et al, 2011;Saï, 2011). Crack closure in orthotropic materials was modelled recently in 2D (Goidescu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to model more complex behavior they may be functions, e.g. phase fractions of composites, see and the references therein. In the case of non‐constant aj, so that taj0, an additional term arises in the remaining inequality due to truerightσ:tε=j=1Nbold-italicσj:tbold-italicεj+j=1Ntaj0.16emσ:bold-italicεj.Including the second sum into considerations, evolution equations for the aj must be given, and thermodynamical consistency requires much more effort to prove.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to model more complex behavior they may be functions, e.g. phase fractions of composites, see [25][26][27] and the references therein. In the case of non-constant a j , so that ∂ t a j = 0, an additional term arises in the remaining inequality due to…”
Section: Remark 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesion problems aside, though some authors consider that a bulk characterization of the adhesive polymer might be enough (Lilleheden, 1994), this suggestion is far from universally accepted; mainly 80 due to the hydrostatic pressure effects undergone by the polymer in a confined state between substrates. It is of course possible to take into account the stress triaxiality or the pressure sensitivity effects in a bulk 2 state by using specific notched cylindrical bar specimens (Saï et al, 2011), however, this is made very difficult in the case of an anisotropic behavior which may occur with filled adhe-85 sives (Joannès et al, 2010). Then it is often necessary to employ in situ characterization devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%