Over the last decade, an increasing number of numerical studies have proposed controlledsource electromagnetic (CSEM) techniques for monitoring of fluid flow in reservoirs, for example, in the framework of hydrocarbon production or CO 2 storage scenarios. A fundamental prerequisite for any monitoring application in practice is repeatability of the measurements, particularly in areas with high noise levels.Here, we report on CSEM data acquired across a producing oil field on land in three consecutive surveys between 2014 and 2016. As major conductivity changes in the reservoir structure are not expected for this time frame, the data sets provide an excellent basis to study accuracy and repeatability of such measurements over a time span of 2.5 yr.Our results show that uncertainties of single CSEM measurements lie between 0.1 and 10 per cent with a focus around 1 per cent in all surveys. For source-receiver offsets <2 km uncertainties are in the range of ∼0.1-0.3 per cent, proportional to the transfer function amplitudes, and are dominated by intrinsic noise of the measuring system. At source-receiver distances >4 km external noise resulting from natural electromagnetic field variations and powered installations dominates uncertainties that assume minimum absolute values of 10 −9 -10 −10 V A −1 m −1 with lowest values at frequencies between 0.1 and 10 Hz.Overall, repeatability of CSEM measurements depends on a range of factors, including source-receiver distances, component of the transfer function, source-polarization and relocation errors, in particular at sites close to the source, where the geometry and characteristics of the source fields vary rapidly in space. Best repeatability was observed for receiver stations at 2-4 km distance from the source and frequencies <20 Hz. At these stations, phases and amplitudes of transfer functions usually agreed within ±1 • and ±5 per cent between measurements. Such values are in a range as expected from time-lapse signals due to resistivity changes in target (reservoir) formations. Hence, precise surveying procedures are essential.We also measured the vertical electric field (E z ) with a newly developed receiver chain in a 200 m deep observation borehole. The vertical electric field component shows generally higher sensitivity to resistivity changes in reservoir structures than the horizontal electric fields measured at surface. Although amplitudes of E z are about one to two orders of magnitude smaller than amplitudes of horizontal electric fields, recordings of E z are stable. More importantly, E z transfer functions of three measurements between 2015 and 2016 show excellent quality and repeatability within <±2 • and <±5 per cent, similar as horizontal electric fields indicating that noise conditions at depth improve when compared with sensors at surface.