2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-model integrated error correction for streamflow simulation based on Bayesian model averaging and dynamic system response curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple arithmetic averaging distributes equal weights among hydrological models, mirroring the theoretical approach of EWA. EWA: Equal-weighted average of individual forecast [39] Mean: Merging without assigning any specific weight [39] Trimmed Mean: Trim outlier before averaging [4] Weighted Granger and Newbold Methods: Weight estimation with (type 1) or without (type 2) correlations consideration [41] WAM-OLS: Weight estimation through multiple linear regression [42] RTMOCM: Linear Transfer Function Model integration [43] RSWM: Runoff-scale weighting with flow stages [44] WAM-MOGWO: Multi-objective grey wolf optimization for weighting [41] Granger and Ramanathan Methods GRA: Ordinary least squares (OLS)-based weighting Easy and quick implementation; Hedging against the use of bad model; Only GRC has bias correction steps GRA cannot construct density forecasts; GRC sometimes produces unrealistic results [41] GRB: Weights are constrained unity [41] GRC: Weighting with a bias correction [7] Regression Methods PLSR: Regression coefficient estimation using partial OLS [31] CCR: Bias correction with a constant term [39] PCR: Transfer predictor variable to orthogonal variables [45] SWR: Lagged forecast error and unbiased forecast [46] NGR: Gaussian mean as regression coefficient [47] CBP-MLR: Conditional bias incorporation for error reduction [47] Com-MLR: Weighted average of MLR and CBP-MLR [2] Bayesian QR-BMA: Quantile regression-based BMA [48] BMA-LR: BMA in linear regression model [48] BMA-GLM: BMA in the generalized linear model [49] SBMC: Sequential addition of new information [50] BMA-WVC: BMA-based ensemble multi-wavelet Volterra coupled approach [51] CBMA: Copula function integrated BMA [52] HBMA: Hierarchical BMA for uncertainty segregation [53] CBP-BMA: Copula Bayesian Processor with BMA for PDF relaxation [54] (e-Bay) BMA: Ensemble-based dynamic Bayesian averaging [55] BMA-DSRC: BMA integrated with the dynamic system response curve [56] VB-LSTM: Regression-based Variational Bayesian Long Short-Term Memory…”
Section: Simple Averaging Methods (Sam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The simple arithmetic averaging distributes equal weights among hydrological models, mirroring the theoretical approach of EWA. EWA: Equal-weighted average of individual forecast [39] Mean: Merging without assigning any specific weight [39] Trimmed Mean: Trim outlier before averaging [4] Weighted Granger and Newbold Methods: Weight estimation with (type 1) or without (type 2) correlations consideration [41] WAM-OLS: Weight estimation through multiple linear regression [42] RTMOCM: Linear Transfer Function Model integration [43] RSWM: Runoff-scale weighting with flow stages [44] WAM-MOGWO: Multi-objective grey wolf optimization for weighting [41] Granger and Ramanathan Methods GRA: Ordinary least squares (OLS)-based weighting Easy and quick implementation; Hedging against the use of bad model; Only GRC has bias correction steps GRA cannot construct density forecasts; GRC sometimes produces unrealistic results [41] GRB: Weights are constrained unity [41] GRC: Weighting with a bias correction [7] Regression Methods PLSR: Regression coefficient estimation using partial OLS [31] CCR: Bias correction with a constant term [39] PCR: Transfer predictor variable to orthogonal variables [45] SWR: Lagged forecast error and unbiased forecast [46] NGR: Gaussian mean as regression coefficient [47] CBP-MLR: Conditional bias incorporation for error reduction [47] Com-MLR: Weighted average of MLR and CBP-MLR [2] Bayesian QR-BMA: Quantile regression-based BMA [48] BMA-LR: BMA in linear regression model [48] BMA-GLM: BMA in the generalized linear model [49] SBMC: Sequential addition of new information [50] BMA-WVC: BMA-based ensemble multi-wavelet Volterra coupled approach [51] CBMA: Copula function integrated BMA [52] HBMA: Hierarchical BMA for uncertainty segregation [53] CBP-BMA: Copula Bayesian Processor with BMA for PDF relaxation [54] (e-Bay) BMA: Ensemble-based dynamic Bayesian averaging [55] BMA-DSRC: BMA integrated with the dynamic system response curve [56] VB-LSTM: Regression-based Variational Bayesian Long Short-Term Memory…”
Section: Simple Averaging Methods (Sam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several complex BMA-based merging methods have also been developed and applied, such as integrating BMA and data assimilation for uncertainty reduction [95], BMA-based ensemble multi-wavelet Volterra approach (BMA-WVC) for uncertainty reduction [50], Copula Bayesian Processors with BMA (CBP-BMA) for uncertainty analysis [53], Ensemble-based dynamic Bayesian averaging approach (e-Bay) for uncertainty quantification [54], Quantile regression-based BMA (QR-BMA) for bias correction and enhanced forecasting [9], Regression based Variational Bayesian Long Short-Term Memory network (VB-LSTM) to address the impact of ensemble members [56]. BMA is integrated with a dynamic system response curve (BMA-DSRC) [55]. These methods aim to further enhance the performance and capabilities of multi-model combinations using BMA.…”
Section: Bayesian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimation of these weights can be based on a variety of methodologies, including multivariate linear regression [21], least squares methods [16], machine-learning techniques [20,22], or Bayesian model averaging [23][24][25]. Wang et al [26] constructed two multi-model ensemble models based on the dynamic system response curve (DSRC) and Bayesian model averaging (BMA). The integrated forecast results for three process-driven hydrological models (XAJ, HBV, and VHY models) were significantly superior to the baseline model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%