2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cec48606.2020.9185785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Automatic Algorithm Configuration for the Classification Problem of Imbalanced Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Thus, some works have exploited this parameter variety, as e.g., in [36,37], where optimized versions of MOLS have been proposed for the imbalanced classification problem by means of the automatic algorithm configuration (AAC) paradigm. Note that we have chosen the best identified parameters for MOLS from this literature, i.e., a initial population of solution of size 100, an archive of max size 500, a restart strategy, a random selection of solution and an exploration of all neighbors.…”
Section: Multi-objective Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Thus, some works have exploited this parameter variety, as e.g., in [36,37], where optimized versions of MOLS have been proposed for the imbalanced classification problem by means of the automatic algorithm configuration (AAC) paradigm. Note that we have chosen the best identified parameters for MOLS from this literature, i.e., a initial population of solution of size 100, an archive of max size 500, a restart strategy, a random selection of solution and an exploration of all neighbors.…”
Section: Multi-objective Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we are also going to add the possibility for solvers to communicate their search space in order to improve their diversification potential. Finally, the performance of our parallel MOLS algorithm should also be investigated on other problems, such as the rule mining problem [28]. Indeed, because the evaluation steps of this problem are more expensive, we believe that hybrid methods would be more suitable.…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%