2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective based on parallel vector evaluated particle swarm optimization for optimal steady-state performance of power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If solution space of optimisation problem is D dimensions, space vector is presented as -th element, where is location of -th element, and also a conceivable explanation. It is being broadly used for solving variable optimization problems as it is very easy to understand and has great convergence rapidity [11] , [16] , [43] , [49] . In addition to SVM, PSO is presented for obtaining optimum constraints in SVM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If solution space of optimisation problem is D dimensions, space vector is presented as -th element, where is location of -th element, and also a conceivable explanation. It is being broadly used for solving variable optimization problems as it is very easy to understand and has great convergence rapidity [11] , [16] , [43] , [49] . In addition to SVM, PSO is presented for obtaining optimum constraints in SVM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions generated by the algorithm may be infeasible because the constraints may be violated [49]. Several methods are used to handle the constraint of optimization problem such as specific crossover operator and penalty method.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since the inception of PSO in 1995, a significant number of modifications have been made to the basic algorithm for realizing performance improvements [6]. We use quantum discrete particle swarm optimization to solve this problem.…”
Section: Modelling the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%