2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective co-operative co-evolutionary algorithm for minimizing carbon footprint and maximizing line efficiency in robotic assembly line systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They propose a mixed-integer programming model to minimize makespan and utilize a CPLEX solver for solving small-sized problems, making use of two metaheuristics: a restarted simulated annealing algorithm and a co-evolutionary algorithm, to address this NP-hard problem. Nilakantan et al [17] optimize carbon footprint and line efficiency simultaneously and utilize a multi-objective co-operative co-evolutionary algorithm. These types of problems are naturally suited to being solved by implementing metaheuristics, as can be seen from the solution strategies utilized in the literature listed above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose a mixed-integer programming model to minimize makespan and utilize a CPLEX solver for solving small-sized problems, making use of two metaheuristics: a restarted simulated annealing algorithm and a co-evolutionary algorithm, to address this NP-hard problem. Nilakantan et al [17] optimize carbon footprint and line efficiency simultaneously and utilize a multi-objective co-operative co-evolutionary algorithm. These types of problems are naturally suited to being solved by implementing metaheuristics, as can be seen from the solution strategies utilized in the literature listed above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of TLBO and AC are the same as in the literatures [17,43], and the parameters of DDABCA are shown in Table 1. The range means the different parameters have been tested for DDABCA, and the value is the best parameters after the test [44]. All of the algorithms are coded in Matlab programming language and tested on an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4430S CPU @ 2.70GHz PC with 4GB RAM.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to help enterprises to quantify the carbon footprint indicator, Liu et al [22] proposed a method for calculating the carbon footprint of workshop products and an improved fruit fly optimization algorithm to minimize the carbon footprint and production cycle of all products. Nilakantan et al [23] developed a study on the robot assembly line system, using a multi-objective co-evolution algorithm to solve the carbon footprint minimization problem. Piroozfar et al [24] proposed an improved multi-objective genetic algorithm to solve the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem while minimizing the total carbon footprint and total number of delayed jobs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for the sixth operation of job 4, it can select two machines at stage 3 for processing. The processing time of O 46 is P 23 46 = 1, the completion time of the previous operation is C 45 = 9. The earliest time of the first machine at stage 3, which meets the processing time constraint between operations allowed us to start processing is S 46 T 31 = 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%