2020
DOI: 10.1177/0954407020932692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of vehicle body with negative Poisson’s ratio structure based on factorial analysis

Abstract: To improve vehicle side crashworthiness, this paper first introduces the negative Poisson’s ratio structure to the traditional B-pillar and proposes a negative Poisson’s ratio B-pillar. Then, the performance of the negative Poisson’s ratio B-pillar is studied in detail by comparison with a traditional B-pillar and honeycomb B-pillar. Aiming at the problem that the side crashworthiness is also significantly affected by the side structure parameters of vehicle body, the factorial analysis theory is adop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When referring to the lateral "Stability indexes", for instance, yaw rate and sideslip angle, we can find the same trends with the aforementioned safety indexes as demonstrated in Figures 9,10,17,and 18. The RMSEs for yaw rate and sideslip angle improve about 67.6%, 29.5%, and 90.4%, 26.7% with respect to pure braking and static allocation in highway impact as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Control Performance Verificationsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When referring to the lateral "Stability indexes", for instance, yaw rate and sideslip angle, we can find the same trends with the aforementioned safety indexes as demonstrated in Figures 9,10,17,and 18. The RMSEs for yaw rate and sideslip angle improve about 67.6%, 29.5%, and 90.4%, 26.7% with respect to pure braking and static allocation in highway impact as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Control Performance Verificationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, the analysis of the accidents data shows the side impacts in MEA are more harmful to drivers and passengers [9]. Major reasons for this phenomenon are that the side parts of the vehicle are poorly designed with energy absorption components with respect to engine compartment or trunk [10][11][12]. What's more, the back mirrors and looking ahead are insufficient to provide all the information about adjacent paths [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, NSGA-II introduces a new strategy, thus improving the overall operation speed and robustness as well as expanding the sampling space. [25][26][27] Moreover, it uses two operators: crowding comparison and crowding degree to replace the original shared radius, which can be used as a standard to compare the sorted peers, therefore the individuals can distribute averagely in the population, and maintain its diversity. The mechanism of crossover as well as abrupt mutation is usually described by SBX (Simulated Binary crossover) method in NSGA-II, and its formula is as follows:…”
Section: Conduction Of Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the negative Poisson's ratio B‐pillar has better crashworthiness, providing a theoretical basis for optimizing the car's side crashworthiness. Wu et al 21 used a combination of reliability optimization design methods, finite element analysis, and other methods to optimize the side structure of the car to improve its crashworthiness. Optimization analysis results show that this method can improve the safety of car collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%