2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective electric distribution network reconfiguration solution using runner-root algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
64
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to expose the predominance of mGWO algorithm in tackling DNR problem, the viable indices that have obtained by FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] techniques for test systems-I, and CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] for test systems-II including mGWO were contrasted in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. The improvement in PLRI of mGWO over FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0375, 00286, 0.0353, 0.0357, 0.0104 and 0.0065 respectively in case of test system-I. Similarly, the PLRI has minimized by mGWO over CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22], AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0074, 0.008, 0.0072 and 0.0048 respectively in case of test system-II.…”
Section: Comparison Of Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to expose the predominance of mGWO algorithm in tackling DNR problem, the viable indices that have obtained by FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] techniques for test systems-I, and CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] for test systems-II including mGWO were contrasted in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. The improvement in PLRI of mGWO over FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22] and AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0375, 00286, 0.0353, 0.0357, 0.0104 and 0.0065 respectively in case of test system-I. Similarly, the PLRI has minimized by mGWO over CSA [17], IAICA [21], MBFOA [22], AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0074, 0.008, 0.0072 and 0.0048 respectively in case of test system-II.…”
Section: Comparison Of Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, enhancement in NVDI of mGWO over FWA [16], CSA [17], RRA [18], IAICA [21] and AWIDPSO [25] is 0.0035, 0.0024, 0.0036, 0.007 and 0.0006 respectively in case of test system-I. At the same time, the NVDI has improved by mGWO is 0.0104, 0.0099 and 0.0077 higher than CSA [17], IAICA [21] and AWIDPSO [25] respectively in case of test system-II.…”
Section: Comparison Of Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, both the studies 52,53 did not consider renewable DG and reconfiguration. Researchers have also used other optimization techniques such as simulated annealing, 54 artificial immune algorithm, 55,56 vaccine-enhanced artificial immune system, 57 modified plant growth simulation algorithm, 58 PSO, 59,60 GA 61-63 , runner root algorithm, 64 harmony search algorithm, 65 artificial bee colony algorithm, 66,67 hybrid Harmony search and particle artificial bee colony algorithm, 68 interval analysis, 69 stochastic MILP, 70 Ant Colony Optimization, 71 hybrid receding horizon control and scenario analysis, 72 nondominated sorting GA, 73 fuzzy mutated GA, 74 tabu search, 75 Benders decomposition approach, 76 and evolutionary programming. 77 Summary of the reviewed literature is presented in Tables 1 and 2. From the above literature survey, it is seen that most of the researchers have studied either DG installation or network reconfiguration for power loss minimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%