2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective micro-geometry optimization of gear tooth supported by response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the regions close to the tooth contact area, where a detailed description of the geometry is required to properly capture contact phenomena, the element size was set to 0.11 mm, based on a convergence analysis [4]. Considerably coarser mesh was created in the regions that are sufficiently far from the meshing teeth.…”
Section: Ste Estimation In Lightweight Gears By Nonlinear Fe Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the regions close to the tooth contact area, where a detailed description of the geometry is required to properly capture contact phenomena, the element size was set to 0.11 mm, based on a convergence analysis [4]. Considerably coarser mesh was created in the regions that are sufficiently far from the meshing teeth.…”
Section: Ste Estimation In Lightweight Gears By Nonlinear Fe Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sidebands are instead clearly visible in the FFT analysis of the mesh stiffness derived from the STE curve according to (4) and shown in Figure 15. Dynamic sideband amplifications are observed also in the waterfall diagram shown in Figure 16.…”
Section: Effect Of Ste Harmonic Component Due To Discontinuities In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, they used a method combining the finite element method and semi analytical solution. In another work, Korta and Mundo [20] aimed to find optimal microgeometry modifications of tooth profile of a pair of identical spur gears, providing decreased values of peak-topeak transmission error and maximal contact stress along the meshing cycle. They used three kinds of metamodeling techniques: the Gaussian Process (stochastic), the Shepard k-Nearest (non parametric deterministic) and the Polynomial (parametric deterministic).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of references [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] highlights a common fact that the proposed design approaches employ exclusively one type of models, analytical or numerical (i.e. FEM) one, to evaluate the performances of any design candidate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%