2016 6th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccke.2016.7802107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective mobile robot path planning based on A* search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12a is ''% greater than shortest path''. For a particular Monte Carlo iteration k, the x-axis value is calculated according to (12).…”
Section: B Software Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12a is ''% greater than shortest path''. For a particular Monte Carlo iteration k, the x-axis value is calculated according to (12).…”
Section: B Software Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AnalogSim k pathlength − Dijkstra k shortestPath Dijkstra k shortestPath (12) The y-axis of Fig. 12a is ''% greater than lowest cost''.…”
Section: B Software Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same work described planning in belief space, with collision probability and multi-objective, proposing one algorithm that is more accurate but with higher computation costs and another that sacrifices accuracy but is more efficient. Using the Mars Rover scenario (3D), Ref [35] developed a MOPP using A* search with real objectives (minimize difficulty, danger, elevation, and length). Usage of the Pareto front and the Pareto optimal in every step of A* was proposed by [36,37] using memetic algorithms in order to optimize both path length and smoothness.…”
Section: Multi-objective Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There does not exist an algorithm that provides an exact analytic solution to such a problem. A series of methods have been proposed and widely applied to solve the optimization problem, such as simulated annealing algorithm [5], artificial potential field algorithm [6], A* algorithm [7], RRT algorithm [8], polynomial optimization method [9], and heuristic approaches [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%