2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3094044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Non-Fragile Robust Attitude Control for Flexible Microsatellite Close-Proximity Inspection

Abstract: In this paper, the non-fragile robust attitude control problem is investigated for flexible microsatellite close-proximity inspection, with external disturbances, parameter uncertainties and input constraints. Firstly, the attitude motion model of microsatellite with flexible appendages is established. Secondly, a non-fragile robust dynamic output feedback controller (RDOFC) with multiplicative gain variations (MGV) is designed to satisfy the multi-objective requirements, including pole assignment, H ∞ disturb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…} 𝜔 > 0 is ensured and it can be removed from the left hand side of the inequality (18). It should also be pointed out that when the MRPs approach its boundary 𝜌 𝜎𝑖 , then 𝜆 1𝑖 tends to one and function…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…} 𝜔 > 0 is ensured and it can be removed from the left hand side of the inequality (18). It should also be pointed out that when the MRPs approach its boundary 𝜌 𝜎𝑖 , then 𝜆 1𝑖 tends to one and function…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, achieving high accuracy attitude control for spacecraft system has become a challenging problem. Over the past few years, the demanding issue of spacecraft attitude control has attracted profound attention and numerous control laws are available; for instance, backstepping method [9], eventtriggered control [10,11], model predictive control (MPC) [12,13], sliding mode control (SMC) [14][15][16][17], non-fragile output-feedback control [18,19], adaptive control [20], fuzzy control [21], fault-tolerant control [22], disturbance observer-based control [23][24][25][26][27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show the effectiveness of the proposed methods, the disturbance estimation and control performances are verified via numerical simulations. The parameters of servicing spacecraft and non-cooperative target are shown in Table 1 [36]. For the initial values, the vectors r e (0) = [1, −0.5, 0.5] T and e v (0) = [−0.15, 0.1, 0.05] T are selected.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 respectively show the control force and torque on position channel and attitude channel, where it can be seen that the maximum force (or torque) in steady-state phase is less than 1.5N (Nm). Meanwhile, the control energy consumption index defined as E = T 0 ∥u∥ 2 dt is also compared with the TSMC proposed in [18], where T is the time interval [36]. The energy consumption is simulated in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%