2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective open location-routing model with split delivery for optimized relief distribution in post-earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
118
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(d) Accurate, real-time relief demand information is required but almost inaccessible. Therefore, the existing studies are classified into two categories: (1) humanitarian or DOM during the response stage, especially for emergency logistics planning (Caunhye et al 2016;Gutjahr and Nolz 2016;Wang et al 2014) and (2) disaster dynamic prediction and evaluation of the emergency level (Sheu 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Accurate, real-time relief demand information is required but almost inaccessible. Therefore, the existing studies are classified into two categories: (1) humanitarian or DOM during the response stage, especially for emergency logistics planning (Caunhye et al 2016;Gutjahr and Nolz 2016;Wang et al 2014) and (2) disaster dynamic prediction and evaluation of the emergency level (Sheu 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of material shortage in the initial stage of emergency material dispatch, Najafi et al [16] proposed a stochastic model to manage emergency materials and developed a robust optimization method to ensure that the dispatching scheme was applicable to all earthquake situations. Wang et al [17] constructed a nonlinear integer programming model by considering emergency time, emergency cost, and batch transportation reliability. The model adopted a non-dominant-sorted genetic algorithm and non-dominant sorting of differential evolution algorithm.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints (4) and constraints (5) represents that in addition to the last service point for each vehicle, each disaster point can only receive a rescue service; Constraints (6) represents that the amount of material taken away by vehicles is not greater than the amount of material from rescue points; Constraints (7) represents that the amount of material taken away by vehicles must be more than the demand of all disaster points; Constraints (8) represents the amount of material that the vehicle unloads each time; Constraints (9) represents the demand for the last service point of each vehicle must be met; Constraints (10 )represents the time the vehicles arrive at disaster points.…”
Section: Problem and Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the analysis of the change in demand and road network, Bard proposed the method of vehicle routing choice based on nonlinear utility function [1]; Nesrin considered the effects of dynamic traffic information in emergency rescue route selection [2]; Based on bi-objective model, Victor put forward the vehicle selection strategy [3]; In order to minimize the transportation cost and distribution fairness, Burcu set up a mixed integer programming model [4]; Wang studied the open vehicle routing problem under emergency logistics [5]; Alberto studied the location and vehicle routing problem in drug delivery [6]; Sascha studied the dynamic problem of emergency rescue vehicle routing [7]; Lei studied vehicle routing problem in random demand environment [8]. Based on the discussion above, there are few studies on the rescue effect in the present literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%